Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28724702›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of experimental biology2017

Stereopsis in animals: evolution, function and mechanisms.

Vivek Nityananda, Jenny C A Read

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of experimental biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 113 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. PSD-95 drives binocular vision maturation critical for predation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Eye-head coordination during goal-directed orienting in mice.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Predation via motion parallax in one of two gleaning insects.The Journal of experimental biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Does neural computation feel like something?Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. New Approaches to 3D Vision.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  20. Stereopsis without correspondence.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Vivek NityanandaWissenschaftskolleg zu Berlin, Institute for Advanced Study, Wallotstraße 19, Berlin 14193, Germany vivek.nityananda@ncl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-2878-2425
Jenny C A ReadNewcastle University, Institute of Neuroscience, Henry Wellcome Building, Framlington Place, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE2 4HH, UK.
Institute for Advanced Study · DENewcastle University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stereopsis is the computation of depth information from views acquired simultaneously from different points in space. For many years, stereopsis was thought to be confined to primates and other mammals with front-facing eyes. However, stereopsis has now been demonstrated in many other animals, including lateral-eyed prey mammals, birds, amphibians and invertebrates. The diversity of animals known to have stereo vision allows us to begin to investigate ideas about its evolution and the underlying selective pressures in different animals. It also further prompts the question of whether all animals have evolved essentially the same algorithms to implement stereopsis. If so, this must be the best way to do stereo vision, and should be implemented by engineers in machine stereopsis. Conversely, if animals have evolved a range of stereo algorithms in response to different pressures, that could inspire novel forms of machine stereopsis appropriate for distinct environments, tasks or constraints. As a first step towards addressing these ideas, we here review our current knowledge of stereo vision in animals, with a view towards outlining common principles about the evolution, function and mechanisms of stereo vision across the animal kingdom. We conclude by outlining avenues for future work, including research into possible new mechanisms of stereo vision, with implications for machine vision and the role of stereopsis in the evolution of camouflage.

Indexed as

Depth PerceptionAnimalsBioengineeringBiological EvolutionVision, Binocular3DCamouflage breakingCoarse and fine stereopsisRange-finding

Identifiers

PMID28724702
PMCPMC5536890
OpenAlexW2738597473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.