Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28724555›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2017

Susceptibility Testing for the Polymyxins: Two Steps Back, Three Steps Forward?

Shawn Vasoo

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Evaluation of an adapted method of relative growth to determine the susceptibility of Enterobacterales to polymyxin B by MALDI-TOF MS.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. RapidResa PolymyxinAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  13. Susceptibility Testing of Colistin forAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Genomic Analysis of CarbapenemaseMicroorganisms · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shawn VasooDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Infectious Diseases Research Laboratory, Institute of Infectious Diseases and Epidemiology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore; Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore shawn_vasoo@ttsh.com.sg.
Tan Tock Seng Hospital · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Optimizing and standardizing susceptibility testing for the polymyxins have become pressing issues, given the rise in multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli. Recently, both the CLSI and EUCAST have recommended broth microdilution (BMD) (without polysorbate) as the reference method for polymyxin susceptibility testing. In this issue, K. L. Chew et al. (J Clin Microbiol 55:2609-2616, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.00268-17) compare the performances of three commercial BMD panels and the Etest to the reference, BMD, for polymyxin B and colistin, using 76

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsColistinDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialEnterobacteriaceaeEscherichia coli ProteinsHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPolymyxin BAnti-Bacterial AgentsColistinEscherichia coli ProteinsMCR-1 protein, E coliPolymyxin B

Identifiers

PMID28724555
PMCPMC5648694
OpenAlexW2739116882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.