Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28724535›Full record

ArticleRNA (New York, N.Y.)2017

Priming in a permissive type I-C CRISPR-Cas system reveals distinct dynamics of spacer acquisition and loss.

Chitong Rao, Denny Chin, Alexander W Ensminger

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in RNA (New York, N.Y.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Journal of bacteriology · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Distribution characteristics of theInfection and immunity · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Digging into the lesser-known aspects of CRISPR biology.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chitong RaoDepartment of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1M1, Canada.
Denny ChinDepartment of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1M1, Canada.
Alexander W EnsmingerDepartment of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1M1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0824-3704
University of Toronto · CA

Funding

CIHR PHT-148819
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CRISPR-Cas is a bacterial and archaeal adaptive immune system that uses short, invader-derived sequences termed spacers to target invasive nucleic acids. Upon recognition of previously encountered invaders, the system can stimulate secondary spacer acquisitions, a process known as primed adaptation. Previous studies of primed adaptation have been complicated by intrinsically high interference efficiency of most systems against bona fide targets. As such, most primed adaptation to date has been studied within the context of imperfect sequence complementarity between spacers and targets. Here, we take advantage of a native type I-C CRISPR-Cas system in

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingLegionella pneumophilaNucleotide MotifsPlasmidsCRISPR–CasLegionellaprimed adaptationspacer losstype I-C

Identifiers

PMID28724535
PMCPMC5602111
OpenAlexW2952862039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.