Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28724486›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS2017

Behavioral Characteristics of Adult Zebrafish (

Mélissa Cm De Lombaert, Elizabeth L Rick, Lisa A Krugner-Higby, Marc A Wolman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mélissa Cm De LombaertSchool of Veterinary Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin.
Elizabeth L RickDepartment of Zoology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin.
Lisa A Krugner-HigbyResearch and Animal Resources Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin.
Marc A WolmanDepartment of Zoology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin;, Email: mawolman@wisc.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The health of laboratory animals is an ethical responsibility of researchers and a critical determinant of experimental outcome. Therefore, all husbandry procedures should be evaluated for their effects on mortality, behavior, and physiology to maximize animal welfare and minimize experimental variability. For adult zebrafish, the excision of a small portion of the caudal fin (that is, 'fin clipping') under MS222 anesthesia is a common procedure to obtain tissue for genotyping. The potential effect of this procedure on behavioral and physiologic assays of feeding, anxiety, and stress has not previously been assessed. Here, we evaluated feeding behavior, anxiety-associated behaviors, and physiologic indicators of stress at multiple time points within 24 h after performing a standard fin-clip procedure under MS222 anesthesia. Within 1 h of the procedure, fin-clipped fish showed a mild increase in anxiety and exhibited reduced feeding; however, these effects were short-lived, and the fish exhibited baseline levels of anxiety and feeding by 6 and 24 h after fin clipping. Together with the zebrafish's ability to regenerate fin tissue and the low mortality associated with fin clipping, our data support the continued practice of this technique under MS222 anesthesia as a routine husbandry procedure that is unlikely to alter experimental outcomes related to feeding, anxiety, or stress.

Indexed as

Animal WelfareBehavior, AnimalZebrafishAnesthesiaAnimalsAnimals, LaboratoryFemaleGenotyping TechniquesMale

Identifiers

PMID28724486
PMCPMC5517326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.