Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28724436›Full record

ArticleItalian journal of pediatrics2017

Expanding the phenotype of reciprocal 1q21.1 deletions and duplications: a case series.

Martina Busè, Helenia C Cuttaia, Daniela Palazzo, Marcella V Mazara, Salvatrice A Lauricella, Michela Malacarne, Mauro Pierluigi, Simona Cavani, Maria Piccione

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Italian journal of pediatrics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Clinical Application of Chromosomal Microarray Analysis in Pregnant Women with Advanced Maternal Age and Fetuses with Ultrasonographic Soft Markers.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Martina BusèDepartment of Sciences for Health Promotion and Mother and Child Care "Giuseppe D'Alessandro", University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy. mbuse@hotmail.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0825-9159
Helenia C CuttaiaLaboratory of Medical Cytogenetic, AOOR Villa Sofia-Cervello, Palermo, Italy.
Daniela PalazzoRegional Referral Centre for Rare Genetic and Chromosomal Diseases, AOOR Villa Sofia-Cervello, Palermo, Italy.
Marcella V MazaraLaboratory of Medical Cytogenetic, AOOR Villa Sofia-Cervello, Palermo, Italy.
Salvatrice A LauricellaLaboratory of Medical Cytogenetic, AOOR Villa Sofia-Cervello, Palermo, Italy.
Michela MalacarneS.C. Laboratory of Human Genetics, E.O. Galliera Hospital, Genoa, Italy.
Mauro PierluigiS.C. Laboratory of Human Genetics, E.O. Galliera Hospital, Genoa, Italy.
Simona CavaniS.C. Laboratory of Human Genetics, E.O. Galliera Hospital, Genoa, Italy.
Maria PiccioneDepartment of Sciences for Health Promotion and Mother and Child Care "Giuseppe D'Alessandro", University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecurrent reciprocal 1q21.1 deletions and duplications have been associated with variable phenotypes. Phenotypic features described in association with 1q21.1 microdeletions include developmental delay, craniofacial dysmorphism and congenital anomalies. The 1q21.1 reciprocal duplication has been associated with macrocephaly or relative macrocephaly, frontal bossing, hypertelorism, developmental delay, intellectual disability and autism spectrum disorder.

methodsOur study describes seven patients, who were referred to us for developmental delay/intellectual disability, dysmorphic features and, in some cases, congenital anomalies, in whom we identified 1q21.1 CNVs by array-CGH.

resultsOur data confirm the extreme phenotypic variability associated with 1q21.1 microdeletion and microduplication. We observed common phenotypic features, described in previous studies, but we also described, for the first time, congenital hypothyroidism in association with 1q21.1 deletion and trigonocephaly associated with 1q21.1 duplication.

conclusionsThe aim of this study is to contribute to the definition of the phenotype associated with reciprocal 1q21.1 deletions and duplications.

Indexed as

Abnormalities, MultipleChildChromosome DeletionChromosomes, Human, Pair 1FemaleHumansInfantMaleMegalencephalyPhenotypePregnancyPrenatal Diagnosis1q21.1 deletion1q21.1 duplicationArray-CGHDevelopmental delayDysmorphism

Identifiers

PMID28724436
PMCPMC5518118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.