Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28724409›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2017

Hybrid assembly with long and short reads improves discovery of gene family expansions.

Jason R Miller, Peng Zhou, Joann Mudge, James Gurtowski, Hayan Lee, Thiruvarangan Ramaraj, Brian P Walenz, Junqi Liu, Robert M Stupar, Roxanne Denny and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Hybrid Whole-Genome Sequencing ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Trematode Genomics and Proteomics.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. IntegratedNAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Methods to improve the accuracy of next-generation sequencing.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. On a greedy approach for genome scaffolding.Algorithms for molecular biology : AMB · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Genomic Tackling of Human Satellite DNA: Breaking Barriers through Time.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Jason R MillerJ. Craig Venter Institute, 9714 Medical Center Drive, Rockville, MD, 20850, USA. jmiller@jcvi.org.
Peng ZhouDepartment of Plant Biology, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN, USA.
Joann MudgeNational Center for Genome Resources, Santa Fe, NM, USA.
James GurtowskiCold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Harbor, Cold Spring, NY, USA.
Hayan LeeStanford School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Thiruvarangan RamarajNational Center for Genome Resources, Santa Fe, NM, USA.
Brian P WalenzNational Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Junqi LiuDepartment of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, USA.
Robert M StuparDepartment of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, USA.
Roxanne DennyDepartment of Plant Pathology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, USA.
Li SongDepartment of Computer Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Namrata SinghSchool of Integrative Plant Sciences, Plant Breeding and Genetics section, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14850, USA.
Lyza G MaronSchool of Integrative Plant Sciences, Plant Breeding and Genetics section, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14850, USA.
Susan R McCouchSchool of Integrative Plant Sciences, Plant Breeding and Genetics section, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14850, USA.
W Richard McCombieCold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Harbor, Cold Spring, NY, USA.
Michael C SchatzDepartments of Computer Science and Biology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Peter TiffinDepartment of Plant Biology, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN, USA.
Nevin D YoungDepartment of Plant Biology, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN, USA.
Kevin A T SilversteinMinnesota Supercomputing Institute, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

Funding

Single-Cell Biology Shared ResourceP30CA045508 · NCI · COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY · PI John Edward Moses · 1987 to 2026
$118.9M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA045508
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLong-read and short-read sequencing technologies offer competing advantages for eukaryotic genome sequencing projects. Combinations of both may be appropriate for surveys of within-species genomic variation.

methodsWe developed a hybrid assembly pipeline called "Alpaca" that can operate on 20X long-read coverage plus about 50X short-insert and 50X long-insert short-read coverage. To preclude collapse of tandem repeats, Alpaca relies on base-call-corrected long reads for contig formation.

resultsCompared to two other assembly protocols, Alpaca demonstrated the most reference agreement and repeat capture on the rice genome. On three accessions of the model legume Medicago truncatula, Alpaca generated the most agreement to a conspecific reference and predicted tandemly repeated genes absent from the other assemblies.

conclusionOur results suggest Alpaca is a useful tool for investigating structural and copy number variation within de novo assemblies of sampled populations.

Indexed as

DNA Copy Number VariationsGenes, PlantGenomicsMedicago truncatulaMultigene FamilyOryzaPhenotypeTandem Repeat SequencesGenome assemblyHybrid assembly pipelineMedicago truncatulaTandem repeats

Identifiers

PMID28724409
PMCPMC5518131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.