ArticleBMC medical education2017
Learning intraprofessional collaboration by participating in a consultation programme: what and how did primary and secondary care trainees learn?
Article in BMC medical education, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of Peer Benchmarking on Specialist Electronic Consult Performance in a Los Angeles Safety-Net: a Cluster Randomized Trial.Journal of general internal medicine · 2022Trial
- Article
- Learning for doctor-to-doctor collaboration: a qualitative study exploring the experiences of residents and supervisors with intraprofessional workplace learning in complex tertiary care.BMC medical education · 2023Article
- Learning collaboration at the primary-secondary care interface: a dual-method study to define design principles for interventions in postgraduate training programmes.BMC medical education · 2023Review
- Dental students' attitudes and perceptions about intraprofessional collaboration/education.Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences · 2023Article
- Development and validity evidence for the intraprofessional conflict exercise: An assessment tool to support collaboration.PloS one · 2023Review
- Challenges in the working relationship between professional nurses and clinical associates in selected district hospitals in South Africa.Health SA = SA Gesondheid · 2023Article
- Learning objectives of Belgian general practitioner trainees regarding their hospital training: A qualitative study.The European journal of general practice · 2022Article
- Designing the learning of intraprofessional collaboration among medical residents.Medical education · 2022Article
- Exploring power dynamics and their impact on intraprofessional learning.Medical education · 2022Article
- Insights in interprofessional education: Dental hygiene students' suggestions for collaboration.Canadian journal of dental hygiene : CJDH = Journal canadien de l'hygiene dentaire : JCHD · 2022Article
- Learning mechanisms and outcomes of an interprofessional molecular pathology workshop for residents.Academic pathology · 2022Article
- Intraprofessional workplace learning in postgraduate medical education: a scoping review.BMC medical education · 2021Article
- Teaching and Learning Core Values in General Practice/Family Medicine: A Narrative Review.Frontiers in medicine · 2021Article
- Chances for learning intraprofessional collaboration between residents in hospitals.Medical education · 2020Observational
- Competencies to promote collaboration between primary and secondary care doctors: an integrative review.BMC family practice · 2020Review
- Inter-professional education and primary care: EFPC position paper.Primary health care research & development · 2019Article
- Article
- Components and Outcomes in Under- and Postgraduate Medical Education to Prepare for the Delivery of Integrated Care for the Elderly: A Scoping Review.International journal of integrated careArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA growing number of patients require overview and management in both primary and secondary care. This situation requires that primary and secondary care professionals have well developed collaborative skills. While knowledge about interprofessional collaboration and education is rising, little is known about intraprofessional collaboration and education between physicians of various disciplines. This study examines a newly developed consultation programme for trainees in general practice and internal medicine to acquire intraprofessional collaboration skills.
methodsFocus groups were conducted with trainees and their supervisors and mentors to explore what and how the trainees learned by participating in the consultation programme.
resultsTrainees reported that they gained knowledge about and skills in collaboration and consultation they could not have gained otherwise. Furthermore, the programme gave the opportunity to gain other competencies relevant for becoming the medical expert trainees they are expected to be. Learning outcomes were comparable to those described in interprofessional education literature. Interaction, by meeting each other and by discussing cases with mentors or supervisors, appeared to be a key factor in the learning process. Meetings, discussing preconceptions and enthusiasm of the mentors and supervisors facilitated the learning. Technical problems and lack of information hampered the learning. These influencing factors are important for future development of intraprofessional learning programmes.
conclusionsParticipants in an innovative consultation programme for GP- and IM-trainees reported that they acquired consultation and collaboration skills they could not have gained otherwise. Interaction appeared to be an important factor in the learning process. The findings of this study can inform developers of intraprofessional education programmes between primary and secondary care trainees.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.