Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28724246›Full record

ReviewThe Science of the total environment2017

Health consequences of electric lighting practices in the modern world: A report on the National Toxicology Program's workshop on shift work at night, artificial light at night, and circadian disruption.

Ruth M Lunn, David E Blask, Andrew N Coogan, Mariana G Figueiro, Michael R Gorman, Janet E Hall, Johnni Hansen, Randy J Nelson, Satchidananda Panda, Michael H Smolensky and 12 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Science of the total environment, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 166 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
166citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
19.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

166 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 395 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. The Effect of a Photochromic Contact Lens on Visual Function Indoors: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry · 2020
    Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Physiologically-relevant light exposure and light behaviour in Switzerland and Malaysia.Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology · 2026
    Observational

106 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 15 institutions in 4 countries.

Ruth M LunnOffice of the Report on Carcinogens, Division of the National Toxicology Program, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS), Research Triangle Park, NC, United States.
David E BlaskDepartment of Structural and Cellular Biology, Laboratory of Chrono-Neuroendocrine Oncology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, United States.
Andrew N CooganMaynooth University Department of Psychology, National University of Ireland, Maynooth, County Kildare, Ireland.
Mariana G FigueiroLight and Health Program, Lighting Research Center, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY, United States.
Michael R GormanDepartment of Psychology and Center for Circadian Biology, University of California, San Diego, CA, United States.
Janet E HallDivision of Intramural Research, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC, United States.
Johnni HansenDanish Cancer Society Research Centre, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Randy J NelsonDepartment of Neuroscience, Neuroscience Research Institute, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States.
Satchidananda PandaSalk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA, United States.
Michael H SmolenskyDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States; Sleep Medicine, The University of Texas-Houston McGovern School of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States.
Richard G StevensSchool of Medicine, University of Connecticut, Farmington, CT, United States.
Fred W TurekCenter for Sleep & Circadian Biology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, United States.
Roel VermeulenDivision of Environmental Epidemiology, Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences (IRAS), Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Tania CarreónNational Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Cincinnati, OH, United States.
Claire C CarusoNational Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Cincinnati, OH, United States.
Christina C LawsonNational Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Cincinnati, OH, United States.
Kristina A ThayerOffice of Health Assessment and Translation, Division of the National Toxicology Program, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS), Research Triangle Park, NC, United States.
Michael J TweryNational Center on Sleep Disorders Research, Division of Lung Diseases, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), Bethesda, MD, United States.
Andrew D EwensContractor in support of the NIEHS Report on Carcinogens, Integrated Laboratory Systems (ILS), Durham, NC, United States.
Sanford C GarnerContractor in support of the NIEHS Report on Carcinogens, Integrated Laboratory Systems (ILS), Durham, NC, United States.
Pamela J SchwinglContractor in support of the NIEHS Report on Carcinogens, Integrated Laboratory Systems (ILS), Durham, NC, United States.
Windy A BoydOffice of Health Assessment and Translation, Division of the National Toxicology Program, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS), Research Triangle Park, NC, United States. Electronic address: boydw@niehs.nih.gov.
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences · USNational Institute for Occupational Safety and Health · USCircadian (United States) · USDanish Cancer Society · DKIntegrated Laboratory Systems, Inc. · USNational Heart Lung and Blood Institute · USNational University of Ireland, Maynooth · IERensselaer Polytechnic Institute · USSalk Institute for Biological Studies · USThe Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center · USThe University of Texas at Austin · USTulane University · USUniversity of California, San Diego · USUniversity of Connecticut · USUtrecht University · NL

Funding

Integrated Health Assessments for the National Toxicology ProgramZIAES103317 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI ROONEY, ANDREW · 2016 to 2019
$24.4M
Lighting interventions to reduce circadian disruption in rotating shift workersR01OH010668 · OH · RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE · PI FIGUEIRO, MARIANA GROSS · 2015 to 2018
$2.2M
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 ES999999NIOSH CDC HHS R01 OH010668
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The invention of electric light has facilitated a society in which people work, sleep, eat, and play at all hours of the 24-hour day. Although electric light clearly has benefited humankind, exposures to electric light, especially light at night (LAN), may disrupt sleep and biological processes controlled by endogenous circadian clocks, potentially resulting in adverse health outcomes. Many of the studies evaluating adverse health effects have been conducted among night- and rotating-shift workers, because this scenario gives rise to significant exposure to LAN. Because of the complexity of this topic, the National Toxicology Program convened an expert panel at a public workshop entitled "Shift Work at Night, Artificial Light at Night, and Circadian Disruption" to obtain input on conducting literature-based health hazard assessments and to identify data gaps and research needs. The Panel suggested describing light both as a direct effector of endogenous circadian clocks and rhythms and as an enabler of additional activities or behaviors that may lead to circadian disruption, such as night-shift work and atypical and inconsistent sleep-wake patterns that can lead to social jet lag. Future studies should more comprehensively characterize and measure the relevant light-related exposures and link these exposures to both time-independent biomarkers of circadian disruption and biomarkers of adverse health outcomes. This information should lead to improvements in human epidemiological and animal or in vitro models, more rigorous health hazard assessments, and intervention strategies to minimize the occurrence of adverse health outcomes due to these exposures.

Indexed as

LightingShift Work ScheduleAnimalsCircadian RhythmElectricityHumansLightSleepArtificial light at night (ALAN)Circadian disruptionLight at night (LAN)Shift work

Identifiers

PMID28724246
PMCPMC5587396
OpenAlexW2740621908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.