ArticleJAMA surgery2017
Comparison of Wound Complications After Immediate, Delayed, and Secondary Breast Reconstruction Procedures.
Article in JAMA surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
43 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 84 citations in OpenAlex.
- Local Antibiotic Delivery Systems for Infection Prophylaxis in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: What Is the Evidence?Annals of plastic surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Effect of prolonged antibiotic prophylaxis on the occurrence of surgical site wound infection after instant breast reconstruction: A meta-analysis.International wound journal · 2024Pooled it
- Somatoform Disorders Affect Decision-making of Breast Reconstruction Post-Mastectomy of Breast Cancer Patients: A Comparative Hazard Analysis.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026Article
- Optimal Timing of Expander-to-Implant Exchange after Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy: 90-Day Complications and Patient-Reported Outcomes.Plastic and reconstructive surgery · 2026Article
- Balancing Risk and Reconstruction: A Comprehensive Review of Complications in Delayed Breast Reconstruction.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Conservative Management of Breast Implant-Associated Infections: Identifying Risk Factors for Failure.Open forum infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Review
- Imaging donor site complications after autologous breast reconstruction flaps: a pictorial review.Emergency radiology · 2026Review
- Article
- Optimising the unilateral DIEP flap breast reconstruction: A United Kingdom-Netherlands multi-centre comparative study.JPRAS open · 2026Article
- Radiation and Reconstructive Failure: Long-Term Outcomes in Two-Stage Flap Versus Implant Breast Reconstruction.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Infection Risk after Immediate Breast Reconstruction.Journal of the American College of Surgeons · 2025Article
- The Role of Autologous Fat Grafting in Delayed Breast Reconstruction Using Tissue Expanders.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2025Article
- Direct-to-Implant in the Era of Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: Evaluation of the National Trend in 59,313 Patients.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2025Article
- National Trends and In-Hospital Outcomes for Immediate Implant-Based Versus Autologous-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Article
- Novel technique and outcomes of umbilical reconstruction during cytoreductive surgery; a multi-centre study.Techniques in coloproctology · 2025Article
- Evaluation of Complications Following Nipple Areola Sparing Mastectomy with Immediate Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction in Patients with Large Ptotic Breasts.World journal of plastic surgery · 2025Article
- Updates on Breast Reconstruction: Surgical Techniques, Challenges, and Future Directions.World journal of oncology · 2024Review
- Unveiling the Potential of Drain Tip Cultures: Impact on Surgical Site Infections in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction.Journal of breast cancer · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
importanceFew data are available concerning surgical site infection (SSI) and noninfectious wound complications (NIWCs) after delayed (DR) and secondary reconstruction (SR) compared with immediate reconstruction (IR) procedures in the breast.
objectiveTo compare the incidence of SSI and NIWCs after implant and autologous IR, DR, and SR breast procedures after mastectomy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND
participantsThis retrospective cohort study included women aged 18 to 64 years undergoing mastectomy from January 1, 2004, through December 31, 2011. Data were abstracted from a commercial insurer claims database in 12 states and analyzed from January 1, 2015, through February 7, 2017. EXPOSURES: Reconstruction within 7 days of mastectomy was considered immediate. Reconstruction more than 7 days after mastectomy was considered delayed if the mastectomy did not include IR or secondary if the mastectomy included IR. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis codes for SSI and NIWCs.
resultsMastectomy was performed in 17 293 women (mean [SD] age, 50.4 [8.5] years); 61.4% of women had IR or DR. Among patients undergoing implant reconstruction, the incidence of SSI was 8.9% (685 of 7655 women) for IR, 5.7% (21 of 369) for DR, and 3.2% (167 of 5150) for SR. Similar results were found for NIWCs. In contrast, the incidence of SSI was similar after autologous IR (9.8% [177 of 1799]), DR (13.9% [19 of 137]), and SR (11.6% [11 of 95]) procedures. Compared with women without an SSI after implant IR, women with an SSI after implant IR were significantly more likely to have another SSI (47 of 412 [11.4%] vs 131 of 4791 [2.7%]) and an NIWC (24 of 412 [5.8%] vs 120 of 4791 [2.5%]) after SR. The incidence of SSI (24 of 379 [6.3%] vs 152 of 5286 [2.9%]) and NIWC (22 of 379 [5.8%] vs 129 of 5286 [2.4%]) after implant SR was higher in women who had received adjuvant radiotherapy. Wound complications after IR were associated with significantly more breast surgical procedures (mean of 1.92 procedures [range, 0-9] after implant IR and 1.11 [range, 0-6] after autologous IR) compared with women who did not have a complication (mean of 1.37 procedures [range, 0-8] after implant IR and 0.87 [range, 0-6] after autologous IR). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The incidence of SSI and NIWCs was slightly higher for implant IR compared with delayed or secondary implant reconstruction. Women who had an SSI or NIWC after implant IR had a higher risk for subsequent complications after SR and more breast operations. The risk for complications should be carefully balanced with the psychosocial and technical benefits of IR. Select high-risk patients may benefit from consideration of delayed rather than immediate implant reconstruction to decrease breast complications after mastectomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.