ArticlePloS one2017
A validation of 11 body-condition indices in a giant snake species that exhibits positive allometry.
Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.
- Navigating thermal landscapes: habitat use and thermoregulatory trade-offs in a northern viper.Oecologia · 2026Article
- Experimental winter warming increases activity with signs of potential DNA damage in common wall lizards.The Journal of experimental biology · 2025Article
- Article
- Body condition scoring facilitates healthcare monitoring in Hermann's Tortoises (Testudo hermanni ssp.).PloS one · 2024Article
- Body Condition of Reproductive and Non-Reproductive Broad-Snouted Caiman Females.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Article
- Article
- A Unified Approach to Analysis of Body Condition in Green Toads.Diversity · 2022Article
- Comparative host-pathogen associations of Snake Fungal Disease in sympatric species of water snakes (Nerodia).Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Clutch may predict growth of hatchling Burmese pythons better than food availability or sex.Biology open · 2021Article
- Measuring body condition of lizards: a comparison between non-invasive dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, chemical fat extraction and calculated indices.Frontiers in zoology · 2021Article
- Understanding metrics of stress in the context of invasion history: the case of the brown treesnake (Conservation physiology · 2021Article
- Microgeographic variation in body condition of three Mexican garter snakes in central Mexico.PeerJ · 2019Article
- Ophidiomycosis prevalence in Georgia's Eastern Indigo Snake (Drymarchon couperi) populations.PloS one · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Body condition is a gauge of the energy stores of an animal, and though it has important implications for fitness, survival, competition, and disease, it is difficult to measure directly. Instead, body condition is frequently estimated as a body condition index (BCI) using length and mass measurements. A desirable BCI should accurately reflect true body condition and be unbiased with respect to size (i.e., mean BCI estimates should not change across different length or mass ranges), and choosing the most-appropriate BCI is not straightforward. We evaluated 11 different BCIs in 248 Burmese pythons (Python bivittatus), organisms that, like other snakes, exhibit simple body plans well characterized by length and mass. We found that the length-mass relationship in Burmese pythons is positively allometric, where mass increases rapidly with respect to length, and this allowed us to explore the effects of allometry on BCI verification. We employed three alternative measures of 'true' body condition: percent fat, scaled fat, and residual fat. The latter two measures mostly accommodated allometry in true body condition, but percent fat did not. Our inferences of the best-performing BCIs depended heavily on our measure of true body condition, with most BCIs falling into one of two groups. The first group contained most BCIs based on ratios, and these were associated with percent fat and body length (i.e., were biased). The second group contained the scaled mass index and most of the BCIs based on linear regressions, and these were associated with both scaled and residual fat but not body length (i.e., were unbiased). Our results show that potential differences in measures of true body condition should be explored in BCI verification studies, particularly in organisms undergoing allometric growth. Furthermore, the caveats of each BCI and similarities to other BCIs are important to consider when determining which BCI is appropriate for any particular taxon.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.