Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28723588›Full record

ReviewAcademic pediatrics

Shared Decision-Making with Parents of Acutely Ill Children: A Narrative Review.

Paul L Aronson, Eugene D Shapiro, Linda M Niccolai, Liana Fraenkel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Academic pediatrics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Paul L AronsonDepartment of Pediatrics, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn; Department of Emergency Medicine, Section of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn. Electronic address: paul.aronson@yale.edu.
Eugene D ShapiroDepartment of Pediatrics, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn; Department of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Conn; Department of Investigative Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Conn.
Linda M NiccolaiDepartment of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Conn.
Liana FraenkelDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section of Rheumatology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn; Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, Conn.

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Institutional Career Development CoreKL2TR001862 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI CANTLEY, LLOYD G, EDELMAN, E. JENNIFER · 2016 to 2025
$12.2M
Improving Decision Making in Patients with Rheumatic DiseaseK24AR060231 · NIAMS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI FRAENKEL, LIANA · 2011 to 2018
$1.2M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR001862NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NIAMS NIH HHS K24 AR060231
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundShared decision-making (SDM) has mostly been used with adults and parents in the primary care setting, and there is limited knowledge on the use of SDM with parents of acutely ill children. The objective of this study was to review the literature on SDM with parents in the management of acutely ill children.

methodsWe searched MEDLINE, SCOPUS, PsycINFO, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov for English language studies published from the time of database inception to February, 2017. Study eligibility criterion was use of SDM with parents for children aged 18 years or younger with an acute medical problem.

resultsWe identified 2 ongoing clinical trials and 10 published studies that met inclusion criteria: 2 using hypothetical SDM scenarios, 1 mixed methods study, and 7 intervention studies. Only 1 study compared an SDM intervention with usual care in a randomized controlled trial. The limited literature shows that parents of acutely ill children have differing preferences for testing and/or treatment, and that they generally want the opportunity to express those preferences through an SDM process. Use of SDM often results in acutely ill children undergoing fewer and/or less intensive testing or treatment, although the effect on outcomes is unclear.

conclusionsParents welcome participation in SDM for management decisions with their acutely ill child. Further investigation is needed to determine how best to implement SDM with parents of acutely ill children and to assess the effect of SDM on outcomes.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseDecision MakingParentsPatient ParticipationAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolHumansInfantInfant, Newbornacute diseaseadolescentchilddecision-makingemergency servicehospitalinfantnewbornpreschoolshared decision-making

Identifiers

PMID28723588
PMCPMC5756675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.