Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28723197›Full record

ArticleACS sensors2017

In Vivo Biosensing: Progress and Perspectives.

Guoxin Rong, Simon R Corrie, Heather A Clark

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS sensors, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Hill-type pH probes.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2023
    Article
  17. Hemoglobin Microbubbles and the Prediction of Different Oxygen Levels Using RF Data and Deep Learning.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2023
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Guoxin RongDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Northeastern University , Boston, Massachusetts 02115, United States.
Simon R CorrieDepartment of Chemical Engineering, ARC Centre of Excellence in Convergent Bio-Nano Science and Technology, Monash University , Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8029-1896
Heather A ClarkDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Northeastern University , Boston, Massachusetts 02115, United States.

Funding

Polymer-Free Nanosensors To Visualize Biochemical Dynamics in Dendritic SpinesR01NS081641 · NINDS · NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY · PI CLARK, HEATHER A · 2013 to 2017
$1.6M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS081641
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In vivo biosensors are emerging as powerful tools in biomedical research and diagnostic medicine. Distinct from "labels" or "imaging", in vivo biosensors are designed for continuous and long-term monitoring of target analytes in real biological systems and should be selective, sensitive, reversible and biocompatible. Due to the challenges associated with meeting all of the analytical requirements, we found relatively few reports of research groups demonstrating devices that meet the strict definition in vivo. However, we identified several case studies and a range of emerging materials likely to lead to significant developments in the field.

Indexed as

biosensorcontinuousdynamic rangeimplantablein vivonanoparticlereversiblesensorsignal transductionspecificity

Identifiers

PMID28723197
PMCPMC5520645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.