Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28722563›Full record

ArticleHealth research policy and systems2017

The West African experience in establishing steering committees for better collaboration between researchers and decision-makers to increase the use of health research findings.

Namoudou Keita, Virgil Lokossou, Abdramane Berthe, Issiaka Sombie, Ermel Johnson, Kofi Busia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health research policy and systems, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The change-makers of West Africa.Health research policy and systems · 2017
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Namoudou KeitaWest African Health Organisation (WAHO), 01 BP 153, Bobo-Dioulasso 01, Burkina Faso.
Virgil LokossouWest African Health Organisation (WAHO), 01 BP 153, Bobo-Dioulasso 01, Burkina Faso. vlokossou@wahooas.org.
Abdramane BertheMuraz Centre, 01 BP 390, Bobo-Dioulasso 01, Burkina Faso.
Issiaka SombieWest African Health Organisation (WAHO), 01 BP 153, Bobo-Dioulasso 01, Burkina Faso.
Ermel JohnsonWest African Health Organisation (WAHO), 01 BP 153, Bobo-Dioulasso 01, Burkina Faso.
Kofi BusiaWest African Health Organisation (WAHO), 01 BP 153, Bobo-Dioulasso 01, Burkina Faso.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAware of the advantages of a project steering committee (SC) in terms of influencing the development of evidence-based health policies, the West African Health Organisation (WAHO) encouraged and supported the creation of such SCs around four research projects in four countries (Burkina Faso, Nigeria, Senegal and Sierra Leone). This study was conducted to describe the process that was used to establish these committees and its findings aim to assist other stakeholders in initiating this type of process.

methodsThis is a cross-sectional, qualitative study of the initiative's four projects. In addition to a literature review and a review of the project documents, an interview guide was used to collect data from 14 members of the SCs, research teams, WAHO and the International Development Research Center. The respondents were selected with a view to reaching data saturation. The technique of thematic analysis by simple categorisation was used.

resultsTo set up the SCs, a research team in each country worked with health authorities to identify potential members, organise meetings with these members and sought the authorities' approval to formalise the SCs. The SCs' mission was to provide technical assistance to the researchers during the implementation phase and to facilitate the transfer and use of the findings. The 'doing by learning' approach used by each research team, combined with WAHO's catalytic role with each country's Ministry of Health, helped each SC manage its contextual difficulties and function effectively.

conclusionThe involvement of technical and financial partners motivated the researchers and ministries of health, who, in turn, motivated other actors to volunteer on the SCs. The 'doing by learning' approach made it possible to develop strategies adapted to each context to create, facilitate and operate each SC and manage its difficulties. To reproduce such an experience, a strong understanding of the local context and the involvement of strong partners are required.

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorBiomedical ResearchBurkina FasoCapacity BuildingCross-Sectional StudiesHealth Services ResearchHumansNigeriaPolicy MakingResearch PersonnelSenegalSierra LeoneAppropriation of knowledgeCommittee for evaluation and dissemination of innovative technologiesInformation transferInterprofessional collaborationSteeringWest Africa

Identifiers

PMID28722563
PMCPMC5516844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.