Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28722561›Full record

ArticleHealth research policy and systems2017

The quality of free antenatal and delivery services in Northern Sierra Leone.

Manso M Koroma, Samuel S Kamara, Evelyn A Bangura, Mohamed A Kamara, Virgil Lokossou, Namoudou Keita

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health research policy and systems, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Trends and inequalities in adequate antenatal care coverage among women in Sierra Leone, 2008-2019.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Continuum of maternal and newborn health in Sierra Leone: a 2019 national survey.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Manso M KoromaDepartment of Environmental Sciences, Makeni University College, Ernest Bai Koroma University of Science and Technology, Makeni, Sierra Leone. manso_koroma@yahoo.com.
Samuel S KamaraDepartment of Environmental Sciences, Makeni University College, Ernest Bai Koroma University of Science and Technology, Makeni, Sierra Leone.
Evelyn A BanguraDepartment of Environmental Sciences, Makeni University College, Ernest Bai Koroma University of Science and Technology, Makeni, Sierra Leone.
Mohamed A KamaraDepartment of Environmental Sciences, Makeni University College, Ernest Bai Koroma University of Science and Technology, Makeni, Sierra Leone.
Virgil LokossouPrimary Health Care and Health Systems Strengthening Unit, West African Health Organisation, Bobo Dioulasso, Burkina Faso.
Namoudou KeitaPrimary Health Care and Health Systems Strengthening Unit, West African Health Organisation, Bobo Dioulasso, Burkina Faso.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe number of maternal deaths in sub-Saharan Africa continues to be overwhelmingly high. In West Africa, Sierra Leone leads the list, with the highest maternal mortality ratio. In 2010, financial barriers were removed as an incentive for more women to use available antenatal, delivery and postnatal services. Few published studies have examined the quality of free antenatal services and access to emergency obstetric care in Sierra Leone.

methodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted in 2014 in all 97 peripheral health facilities and three hospitals in Bombali District, Northern Region. One hundred antenatal care providers were interviewed, 276 observations were made and 486 pregnant women were interviewed. We assessed the adequacy of antenatal and delivery services provided using national standards. The distance was calculated between each facility providing delivery services and the nearest comprehensive emergency obstetric care (CEOC) facility, and the proportion of facilities in a chiefdom within 15 km of each CEOC facility was also calculated. A thematic map was developed to show inequities.

resultsThe quality of services was poor. Based on national standards, only 27% of women were examined, 2% were screened on their first antenatal visit and 47% received interventions as recommended. Although 94% of facilities provided delivery services, a minority had delivery rooms (40%), delivery kits (42%) or portable water (46%). Skilled attendants supervised 35% of deliveries, and in only 35% of these were processes adequately documented. None of the five basic emergency obstetric care facilities were fully compliant with national standards, and the central and northernmost parts of the district had the least access to comprehensive emergency obstetric care.

conclusionThe health sector needs to monitor the quality of antenatal interventions in addition to measuring coverage. The quality of delivery services is compromised by poor infrastructure, inadequate skilled staff, stock-outs of consumables, non-functional basic emergency obstetric care facilities, and geographic inequities in access to CEOC facilities. These findings suggest that the health sector needs to urgently investigate continuing inequities adversely influencing the uptake of these services, and explore more sustainable funding mechanisms. Without this, the country is unlikely to achieve its goal of reducing maternal deaths.

Indexed as

Maternal MortalityAfrica South of the SaharaAfrica, WesternCross-Sectional StudiesDelivery, ObstetricFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMaternal Health ServicesPregnancyQuality of Health CareSierra Leone

Identifiers

PMID28722561
PMCPMC5516841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.