Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28722510›Full record

ArticleAutophagy2017

BNIP3L-dependent mitophagy accounts for mitochondrial clearance during 3 factors-induced somatic cell reprogramming.

Ge Xiang, Liang Yang, Qi Long, Keshi Chen, Haite Tang, Yi Wu, Zihuang Liu, Yanshuang Zhou, Juntao Qi, Lingjun Zheng and 13 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Autophagy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Metabolic control of induced pluripotency.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023
    Review
  14. The role of mitochondria in rheumatic diseases.Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2022
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Ge Xianga CAS Key Laboratory of Regenerative Biology, Joint School of Life Sciences, Guangzhou Institutes of Biomedicine and Health , Chinese Academy of Sciences , Guangzhou , China ; Guangzhou Medical University , Guangzhou , China.
Liang Yanga CAS Key Laboratory of Regenerative Biology, Joint School of Life Sciences, Guangzhou Institutes of Biomedicine and Health , Chinese Academy of Sciences , Guangzhou , China ; Guangzhou Medical University , Guangzhou , China.
Qi Longa CAS Key Laboratory of Regenerative Biology, Joint School of Life Sciences, Guangzhou Institutes of Biomedicine and Health , Chinese Academy of Sciences , Guangzhou , China ; Guangzhou Medical University , Guangzhou , China.
Keshi Chena CAS Key Laboratory of Regenerative Biology, Joint School of Life Sciences, Guangzhou Institutes of Biomedicine and Health , Chinese Academy of Sciences , Guangzhou , China ; Guangzhou Medical University , Guangzhou , China.
Haite Tanga CAS Key Laboratory of Regenerative Biology, Joint School of Life Sciences, Guangzhou Institutes of Biomedicine and Health , Chinese Academy of Sciences , Guangzhou , China ; Guangzhou Medical University , Guangzhou , China.
Yi Wua CAS Key Laboratory of Regenerative Biology, Joint School of Life Sciences, Guangzhou Institutes of Biomedicine and Health , Chinese Academy of Sciences , Guangzhou , China ; Guangzhou Medical University , Guangzhou , China.
Zihuang Liua CAS Key Laboratory of Regenerative Biology, Joint School of Life Sciences, Guangzhou Institutes of Biomedicine and Health , Chinese Academy of Sciences , Guangzhou , China ; Guangzhou Medical University , Guangzhou , China.
Yanshuang Zhoua CAS Key Laboratory of Regenerative Biology, Joint School of Life Sciences, Guangzhou Institutes of Biomedicine and Health , Chinese Academy of Sciences , Guangzhou , China ; Guangzhou Medical University , Guangzhou , China.
Juntao Qia CAS Key Laboratory of Regenerative Biology, Joint School of Life Sciences, Guangzhou Institutes of Biomedicine and Health , Chinese Academy of Sciences , Guangzhou , China ; Guangzhou Medical University , Guangzhou , China.
Lingjun Zhenga CAS Key Laboratory of Regenerative Biology, Joint School of Life Sciences, Guangzhou Institutes of Biomedicine and Health , Chinese Academy of Sciences , Guangzhou , China ; Guangzhou Medical University , Guangzhou , China.
Wenbo Liua CAS Key Laboratory of Regenerative Biology, Joint School of Life Sciences, Guangzhou Institutes of Biomedicine and Health , Chinese Academy of Sciences , Guangzhou , China ; Guangzhou Medical University , Guangzhou , China.
Zhongfu Yinga CAS Key Laboratory of Regenerative Biology, Joint School of Life Sciences, Guangzhou Institutes of Biomedicine and Health , Chinese Academy of Sciences , Guangzhou , China ; Guangzhou Medical University , Guangzhou , China.
Weimin Fana CAS Key Laboratory of Regenerative Biology, Joint School of Life Sciences, Guangzhou Institutes of Biomedicine and Health , Chinese Academy of Sciences , Guangzhou , China ; Guangzhou Medical University , Guangzhou , China.
Hongyan Shia CAS Key Laboratory of Regenerative Biology, Joint School of Life Sciences, Guangzhou Institutes of Biomedicine and Health , Chinese Academy of Sciences , Guangzhou , China ; Guangzhou Medical University , Guangzhou , China.
Hongmei Lid School of Life Sciences , Sun Yat-sen University , Guangzhou , China.
Xiaobing Lina CAS Key Laboratory of Regenerative Biology, Joint School of Life Sciences, Guangzhou Institutes of Biomedicine and Health , Chinese Academy of Sciences , Guangzhou , China ; Guangzhou Medical University , Guangzhou , China.
Mi Gaoa CAS Key Laboratory of Regenerative Biology, Joint School of Life Sciences, Guangzhou Institutes of Biomedicine and Health , Chinese Academy of Sciences , Guangzhou , China ; Guangzhou Medical University , Guangzhou , China.
Jinglei Liua CAS Key Laboratory of Regenerative Biology, Joint School of Life Sciences, Guangzhou Institutes of Biomedicine and Health , Chinese Academy of Sciences , Guangzhou , China ; Guangzhou Medical University , Guangzhou , China.
Feixiang Baoa CAS Key Laboratory of Regenerative Biology, Joint School of Life Sciences, Guangzhou Institutes of Biomedicine and Health , Chinese Academy of Sciences , Guangzhou , China ; Guangzhou Medical University , Guangzhou , China.
Linpeng Lia CAS Key Laboratory of Regenerative Biology, Joint School of Life Sciences, Guangzhou Institutes of Biomedicine and Health , Chinese Academy of Sciences , Guangzhou , China ; Guangzhou Medical University , Guangzhou , China.
Lifan Duana CAS Key Laboratory of Regenerative Biology, Joint School of Life Sciences, Guangzhou Institutes of Biomedicine and Health , Chinese Academy of Sciences , Guangzhou , China ; Guangzhou Medical University , Guangzhou , China.
Min Lie School of Pharmaceutical Sciences , Sun Yat-Sen University , Guangzhou , China.
Xingguo Liua CAS Key Laboratory of Regenerative Biology, Joint School of Life Sciences, Guangzhou Institutes of Biomedicine and Health , Chinese Academy of Sciences , Guangzhou , China ; Guangzhou Medical University , Guangzhou , China.
Chinese Academy of Sciences · CNGuangzhou Medical University · CNGuangzhou Institutes of Biomedicine and Health · CNSun Yat-sen University · CNAnhui University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) have fewer and immature mitochondria than somatic cells and mainly rely on glycolysis for energy source. During somatic cell reprogramming, somatic mitochondria and other organelles get remodeled. However, events of organelle remodeling and interaction during somatic cell reprogramming have not been extensively explored. We show that both SKP/SKO (Sox2, Klf4, Pou5f1/Oct4) and SKPM/SKOM (SKP/SKO plus Myc/c-Myc) reprogramming lead to decreased mitochondrial mass but with different kinetics and by divergent pathways. Rapid, MYC/c-MYC-induced cell proliferation may function as the main driver of mitochondrial decrease in SKPM/SKOM reprogramming. In SKP/SKO reprogramming, however, mitochondrial mass initially increases and subsequently decreases via mitophagy. This mitophagy is dependent on the mitochondrial outer membrane receptor BNIP3L/NIX but not on mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨ

Indexed as

Cellular ReprogrammingMitophagyAnimalsEmbryo, MammalianEndosomesFibroblastsKruppel-Like Factor 4Membrane Potential, MitochondrialMembrane ProteinsMiceMitochondriaMitochondrial ProteinsModels, Biologicalrab5 GTP-Binding ProteinsTranscription FactorsKlf4 protein, mouseKruppel-Like Factor 4Membrane ProteinsMitochondrial ProteinsNix protein, mouserab5 GTP-Binding ProteinsTranscription FactorsautophagyBNIP3Lendosomemitophagyreprogramming

Identifiers

PMID28722510
PMCPMC5612220
OpenAlexW2739444720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.