Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28722184›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2017

Appropriateness of antiplatelet therapy for primary and secondary cardio- and cerebrovascular prevention in acutely hospitalized older people.

Ilaria Ardoino, Raffaella Rossio, Donnatella Di Blanca, Alessandro Nobili, Luca Pasina, Pier Mannuccio Mannucci, Flora Peyvandi, Carlotta Franchi, REPOSI Investigators

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Spotlight-Introducing a new Commentary series for the BJCP.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ilaria ArdoinoDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Raffaella RossioDepartment of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Donnatella Di BlancaIRCCS - Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche "Mario Negri", Milan, Italy.
Alessandro NobiliIRCCS - Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche "Mario Negri", Milan, Italy.
Luca PasinaIRCCS - Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche "Mario Negri", Milan, Italy.
Pier Mannuccio MannucciScientific Direction, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Flora PeyvandiDepartment of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Carlotta FranchiIRCCS - Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche "Mario Negri", Milan, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6802-8710
REPOSI Investigators

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsAntiplatelet therapy is recommended for the secondary prevention of cardio- and cerebrovascular disease, but for primary prevention it is advised only in patients at very high risk. With this background, this study aims to assess the appropriateness of antiplatelet therapy in acutely hospitalized older people according to their risk profile.

methodsData were obtained from the REPOSI register held in Italian and Spanish internal medicine and geriatric wards in 2012 and 2014. Hospitalized patients aged ≥65 assessable at discharge were selected. Appropriateness of the antiplatelet therapy was evaluated according to their primary or secondary cardiovascular prevention profiles.

resultsOf 2535 enrolled patients, 2199 were assessable at discharge. Overall 959 (43.6%, 95% CI 41.5-45.7) were prescribed an antiplatelet drug, aspirin being the most frequently chosen. Among patients prescribed for primary prevention, just over half were inappropriately prescribed (52.1%), being mainly overprescribed (155/209 patients, 74.2%). On the other hand, there was also a high rate of inappropriate underprescription in the context of secondary prevention (222/726 patients, 30.6%, 95% CI 27.3-34.0%).

conclusionsThis study carried out in acutely hospitalized older people shows a high degree of inappropriate prescription among patients prescribed with antiplatelets for primary prevention, mainly due to overprescription. Further, a large proportion of patients who had had overt cardio- or cerebrovascular disease were underprescribed, in spite of the established benefits of antiplatelet drugs in the context of secondary prevention.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsAspirinCardiologyCardiovascular DiseasesCerebrovascular DisordersDrug PrescriptionsFemaleHospitalizationHumansInappropriate PrescribingItalyMalePlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsPractice Guidelines as TopicAspirinPlatelet Aggregation Inhibitorsantiplatelet therapyappropriatenesscardio- and cerebrovascular preventioninternal medicine and geriatric wardsolder people

Identifiers

PMID28722184
PMCPMC5651307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.