ArticleClinical rheumatology2017
Disease activity, handgrip strengths, and hand dexterity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.
- The effect of structured hand massage on hand function and grip strength in rheumatoid arthritis patients: a randomized controlled pilot study.Rheumatology international · 2026Trial
- Effects of occupational therapy on hand function in patients with systemic sclerosis: a randomized controlled trial.Rheumatology international · 2025Trial
- An Exercise and Educational and Self-management Program Delivered With a Smartphone App (CareHand) in Adults With Rheumatoid Arthritis of the Hands: Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2022Trial
- Handgrip strength testing in rheumatic diseases.Rheumatology international · 2026Review
- Hand Function Impairments Are More Pronounced in Female RA and PsA Patients and Also Found in Patients without Concurrent Hand Inflammation.Medicine and science in sports and exercise · 2025Article
- Hand function in immune-mediated inflammatory rheumatic diseases: assessment and rehabilitation approaches.Rheumatology international · 2025Review
- Sarcopenia in rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases: pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management.Rheumatology international · 2025Review
- Development of artificial intelligence and multi-sensor-based dexterity assessment system: performance evaluation.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2025Article
- Reduced forearm muscle thickness and hand strength in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: an ultrasonographic cross-sectional study.Rheumatology international · 2025Article
- Single-Injection Options for Administering a 320 mg Dose of Bimekizumab: 2 mL Safety Syringe and Auto-injector.Dermatology and therapy · 2025Article
- The Characteristic of Muscle Function for Sarcopenia in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Large-Scale Real-World Cross-Sectional Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Verification of grip strength as an evaluation tool for locomotive syndrome in rheumatoid arthritis.Osteoporosis and sarcopenia · 2024Article
- Effect of traditional Chinese Yijinjing exercise on hand dysfunction in rheumatoid arthritis patients: a randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- The relation between synovitis of individual finger joints and grip force over the first 5 years in early rheumatoid arthritis - a cohort study.Arthritis research & therapy · 2023Article
- Rheumatoid sarcopenia: loss of skeletal muscle strength and mass in rheumatoid arthritis.Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2023Review
- Validation of a Simple Instrument of Fast Application to Track Disability in Leprosy Patients.Revista brasileira de ortopedia · 2023Article
- An examination of relationships between vitamin B12 status and functional measures of peripheral neuropathy in young adult vegetarians.Frontiers in nutrition · 2023Article
- Assessment of disease outcome measures in systemic sclerosis.Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2022Review
- A novel tablet-based application for assessment of manual dexterity and its components: a reliability and validity study in healthy subjects.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2022Article
- Handgrip Strength Features in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Assessed Using an Innovative Cylindrical-Shaped Device: Relationships With Demographic, Anthropometric and Clinical Variables.Journal of medical systems · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory disease affecting the hand joints and leading to impairment in hand functions. Evaluation of functional impairment is necessary for assessing patient's quality of life, disease activity, and treatment outcome. To date, many scientific studies assessed the disease activity of patients with RA, but little attention has been carried out to assess these patients' hand functions and dexterity. The purposes of this study were to determine the clinical relevance of the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH), hand dexterity with the Purdue Pegboard Test (PPT), and handgrip strength and pinch strengths of RA patients and to look into their relation between each other. A prospective trial was performed in women with RA who were followed at the physical medicine and rehabilitation department of our university hospital. Eighty-two women between the ages of 18 and 70, with a diagnosis of RA according to the 2010 American College of Rheumatology/the European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) criterion, were recruited to the study. The Disease Activity Scores were determined by using Disease Activity Score-28 (DAS-28). Handgrip strength was measured with a Jamar dynamometer, and lateral, palmar, and tip pinch strengths were measured by a pinchmeter. Hand functions were evaluated with the PPT, and functional outcomes were assessed with the QuickDASH questionnaire. The mean age of the study group was 49.27 ± 10.69 years. The average values of DAS-28 and the QuickDASH values were found to be 4.22 ± 1.28 and 38.33 ± 19.78, consecutively. High correlation was observed between DAS-28 and the QuickDASH values (p < 0.001). The mean grip strengths in both hands were significantly correlated with the QuickDASH values (p < 0.001), and also, DAS-28 values were very significantly correlated with the mean grip strength in the dominant hand (p < 0.001) and in the nondominant hand (p < 0.01). The mean lateral pinch strengths in both hands were correlated statistically significantly with DAS-28 and the QuickDASH scores (p < 0.001). The mean tip pinch strengths in both hands were correlated with DAS-28 scores, but correlation with the QuickDASH scores was seen just in the dominant hand (p < 0.05). There was no correlation between palmar pinch strengths in both hands with the DAS-28 and QuickDASH scores (p > 0.05). DAS-28 was correlated with PPT performance on the dominant hand (p < 0.05), but there was no correlation with the nondominant hand, both hands, and assembly (p > 0.05). The QuickDASH values were not correlated with all PPT performances (p > 0.05). Handgrip strengths of both hands were positively correlated with the PPT performances (p < 0.05). In conclusion, we determined that handgrip strengths were significantly related to disability and disease activity in the RA patients in our study. The QuickDASH is practical to use in clinical practice, and positively correlates with the disease activity. Dexterity measurements with PPT in the RA patient group were found practical and effective in our study. As a result, we can suggest using QuickDASH questionnaire for functional outcomes, handgrip strength measurements for assessment of hand disability and functional impairments, and also dexterity measurements even in patients with low disease activity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.