ReviewHeart failure reviews2017
The MOGE(S) classification for cardiomyopathies: current status and future outlook.
Review in Heart failure reviews, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.
- Meta-analysis on the immunohistological detection of inflammatory cardiomyopathy in endomyocardial biopsies.Heart failure reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Meta-analysis for the value of colchicine for the therapy of pericarditis and of postpericardiotomy syndrome.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2019Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Diagnosis of cardiac amyloidosis: a systematic review on the role of imaging and biomarkers.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2018Pooled it
- Molecular Pathology of Cardiomyopathies: Bridging Morphology, Genomics, and Clinical Phenotypes.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Review
- Evaluation of Cardiomyopathy-Related Target Genes by Next-Generation Sequencing Method and Investigation of the Phenotype-Genotype Relationship.Molecular syndromology · 2025Article
- Echocardiography-based machine learning algorithm for distinguishing ischemic cardiomyopathy from dilated cardiomyopathy.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2023Article
- Cardiac imaging in cardiotoxicity: a focus on clinical practice.Heart failure reviews · 2021Review
- Review
- The pivotal role of cardiovascular imaging in the identification and risk stratification of non-compaction cardiomyopathy patients.Heart failure reviews · 2020Review
- Authors' response to the letter on HREV-D-19-00059R-1: Advancements in the diagnostic workup, prognostic evaluation and treatment of Takotsubo syndrome.Heart failure reviews · 2020Article
- Advancements in the diagnostic workup, prognostic evaluation, and treatment of takotsubo syndrome.Heart failure reviews · 2020Review
- Re-evaluating the causes and consequences of non-resolving inflammation in chronic cardiovascular disease.Heart failure reviews · 2020Review
- Cardio-oncology, the myth of Sisyphus, and cardiovascular disease in breast cancer survivors.Heart failure reviews · 2019Review
- Review
- Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: an updated review on diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment.Heart failure reviews · 2019Review
- Advances in the diagnosis and treatment of transthyretin amyloidosis with cardiac involvement.Heart failure reviews · 2019Review
- Updates on the Genetic Paradigm in Heart Failure.Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine · 2019Review
- Review on sudden death risk reduction after septal reduction therapies in hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy.Heart failure reviews · 2019Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiomyopathies are complex diseases of multifactorial pathogenesis and have a high morbidity and mortality. Over the past decades, several revisions of classifications and definitions of cardiomyopathies have been proposed, primarily focusing on the phenotypic characterization of cardiomyopathies. The MOGE(S) classification system published in 2013 encompasses the classification of rapidly growing knowledge on genetic mutations, acquired causes (i.e., intramyocardial inflammation, viral infections), and further conditions involved in the induction of cardiomyopathies (e.g., storage diseases, toxicity). It is based on five attributes, including morphofunctional characteristics (M), organ involvement (O), genetic or familial inheritance pattern (G), etiological annotation (E), and optional information about the heart failure functional status (S). This review summarizes the development, the cornerstones of the MOGE(S) classification, and the published data on the clinical relevance of the MOGE(S) classification. We furthermore discuss new issues which might be considered for future updates of the MOGE(S) classification of cardiomyopathies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.