ArticleDevelopment genes and evolution2017
Unexpected UBX expression in the maxilliped of the mystacocarid crustacean Derocheilocharis remanei-evidence for a different way of making a maxilliped?
Article in Development genes and evolution, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In terms of morphology, crustacean maxillipeds are hybrid appendages. They arise in anterior thoracic segments and display characteristics of both locomotory (thoracic) and feeding (gnathal) appendages. Maxillipeds are functionally integrated with the anterior gnathal appendages. Hox gene expression patterns and immunolabeling with the FP6.87 antibody, which detects conserved epitopes of UBX and ABD-A proteins, reveal that maxillipeds are consistently associated with a shift in the expression of the homeotic gene Ubx. Ubx transcription products or proteins only appear in thoracic segments with a typical locomotory thoracopod and are consistently absent in the maxilliped. This pattern is found in various crustaceans: the copepod Mesocyclops, the mysid Mysidium, the decapods Homarus and Periclimenes, the isopod Porcellio, and the amphipod Parhyale. In Parhyale, which possesses maxillipeds on the first thoracic segment, gene manipulation experiments have shown that a leg-like thoracic appendage can be recovered by mis-expressing Ubx in that segment and walking legs can be transformed into maxillipeds by Ubx-knockdown. This survey focuses on the expression of UBX/ABD-A proteins, studied using the FP6.87 antibody, in the larval stages of the mystacocarid crustacean Derocheilocaris remanei. Mystacocarids inhabit the intertidal meiofauna zone of sandy beaches and possess one pair of maxillipeds on the first thoracic segment. Strong UBX/ABD-A expression in the developing maxilliped makes Derocheilocaris unique among crustaceans. Our data might also show that the transformation from locomotory thoracopod to maxilliped cannot be accounted for by the mere presence or absence of UBX, because in mystacocarids, UBX is present in both kinds of limbs. The role of the other Hox gene known to be involved in this transformation, Sex combs reduced (Scr), is unclear. The results presented here may document a new example of a shift in Hox gene function in arthropods. The difference in UBX/ABD-A expression between D. remanei and the copepod maxillipeds is of particular interest because correspondences between the feeding apparatus-including the maxilliped-in mystacocarids and copepods have been suggested as being of phylogenetic significance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.