Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28721375›Full record

ArticleNPJ breast cancer2016

DNA defects, epigenetics, and gene expression in cancer-adjacent breast: a study from The Cancer Genome Atlas.

Melissa A Troester, Katherine A Hoadley, Monica D'Arcy, Andrew D Cherniack, Chip Stewart, Daniel C Koboldt, A Gordon Robertson, Swapna Mahurkar, Hui Shen, Matthew D Wilkerson and 12 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ breast cancer, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Replication Study:eLife · 2018
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Murine Models of Obesity-Related Cancer Risk.Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Field cancerization in breast cancer.The Journal of pathology · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Melissa A TroesterLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Katherine A HoadleyLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Monica D'ArcyLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Andrew D CherniackThe Eli and Edythe L. Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Chip StewartThe Eli and Edythe L. Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Daniel C KoboldtThe McDonnell Genome Institute, Washington University, St Louis, MO, USA.
A Gordon RobertsonCanada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Swapna MahurkarUSC Epigenome Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Hui ShenCenter for Epigenetics, Van Andel Research Institute, Grand Rapids, MI, USA.
Matthew D WilkersonLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Rupninder SandhuLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Nicole B JohnsonDepartment of Pathology, Division of Anatomical Pathology, Beth Isreal Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Kimberly H AllisonDepartment of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Andrew H BeckDepartment of Pathology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Christina YauBuck Institute for Research on Aging, Novato, CA, USA.
Jay BowenThe Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA.
Margi ShethNational Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA.
E Shelley HwangDepartment of Surgery, Duke University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Charles M PerouLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Peter W LairdCenter for Epigenetics, Van Andel Research Institute, Grand Rapids, MI, USA.
Li DingThe McDonnell Genome Institute, Washington University, St Louis, MO, USA.
Christopher C BenzBuck Institute for Research on Aging, Novato, CA, USA.

Funding

Gene Expression Patterns in Human Tumors Identified Using Transcript SequencingU24CA143848 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI HAYES, DAVID N, PEROU, CHARLES M · 2009 to 2016
$20.8M
UCSC-Buck Inst. Genome Data Analysis Center for TCGA Research Network (GDAC)U24CA143858 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA CRUZ · PI BENZ, CHRISTOPHER, HAUSSLER, DAVID H · 2009 to 2016
$8.9M
Mass spectrometry to decode PTM patterns and enhance the Biomarker utility of ERR01CA071468 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO · PI BENZ, CHRISTOPHER · 1996 to 2014
$4.1M
Cancer Control Education ProgramT32CA057726 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Melissa B Gilkey, Melissa A. Troester · 2017 to 2026
$3.7M
Pregnancy, Obesogenic Environments, and Basal-like Breast CancerU01ES019472 · NIEHS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI TROESTER, MELISSA A. · 2010 to 2014
$2.3M
Polyribosome targets mediating mRNA decay for cancer prediction and therapyR21CA155679 · NCI · BUCK INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH ON AGING · PI BENZ, CHRISTOPHER · 2011 to 2012
$464k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA071468NCI NIH HHS R21 CA155679NCI NIH HHS T32 CA057726NCI NIH HHS U24 CA143848NCI NIH HHS U24 CA143858NIEHS NIH HHS U01 ES019472
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recurrence rates after breast-conserving therapy may depend on genomic characteristics of cancer-adjacent, benign-appearing tissue. Studies have not evaluated recurrence in association with multiple genomic characteristics of cancer-adjacent breast tissue. To estimate the prevalence of DNA defects and RNA expression subtypes in cancer-adjacent, benign-appearing breast tissue at least 2 cm from the tumor margin, cancer-adjacent, pathologically well-characterized, benign-appearing breast tissue specimens from The Cancer Genome Atlas project were analyzed for DNA sequence, copy-number variation, DNA methylation, messenger RNA (mRNA) sequence, and mRNA/microRNA expression. Additional samples were also analyzed by at least one of these genomic data types and associations between genomic characteristics of normal tissue and overall survival were assessed. Approximately 40% of cancer-adjacent, benign-appearing tissues harbored genomic defects in DNA copy number, sequence, methylation, or in RNA sequence, although these defects did not significantly predict 10-year overall survival. Two mRNA/microRNA expression phenotypes were observed, including an active mRNA subtype that was identified in 40% of samples. Controlling for tumor characteristics and the presence of genomic defects, this active subtype was associated with significantly worse 10-year survival among estrogen receptor (ER)-positive cases. This multi-platform analysis of breast cancer-adjacent samples produced genomic findings consistent with current surgical margin guidelines, and provides evidence that extratumoral RNA expression patterns in cancer-adjacent tissue predict overall survival among patients with ER-positive disease.

Identifiers

PMID28721375
PMCPMC5515343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.