Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28721371›Full record

ArticleNPJ breast cancer2015

Spatiotemporal progression of metastatic breast cancer: a Markov chain model highlighting the role of early metastatic sites.

Paul K Newton, Jeremy Mason, Neethi Venkatappa, Maxine S Jochelson, Brian Hurt, Jorge Nieva, Elizabeth Comen, Larry Norton, Peter Kuhn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ breast cancer, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Mechanisms of breast cancer dormancy in bone metastasis.Clinical & experimental metastasis · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Reuniting philosophy and science to advance cancer research.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Modeling the Onset of Symptoms of COVID-19.Frontiers in public health · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Bisphosphonate Use and Risk of Recurrence, Second Primary Breast Cancer, and Breast Cancer Mortality in a Population-Based Cohort of Breast Cancer Patients.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Paul K NewtonDepartment of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Jeremy MasonDepartment of Biological Sciences, Dornsife College of Letters, Arts and Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Neethi VenkatappaMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Maxine S JochelsonMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Brian HurtUniversity of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
Jorge NievaNorris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Elizabeth ComenMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Larry NortonMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Peter KuhnDepartment of Biological Sciences, Dornsife College of Letters, Arts and Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCancer cell migration patterns are critical for understanding metastases and clinical evolution. Breast cancer spreads from one organ system to another via hematogenous and lymphatic routes. Although patterns of spread may superficially seem random and unpredictable, we explored the possibility that this is not the case.

aimsDevelop a Markov based model of breast cancer progression that has predictive capability.

methodsOn the basis of a longitudinal data set of 446 breast cancer patients, we created a Markov chain model of metastasis that describes the probabilities of metastasis occurring at a given anatomic site together with the probability of spread to additional sites. Progression is modeled as a random walk on a directed graph, where nodes represent anatomical sites where tumors can develop.

resultsWe quantify how survival depends on the location of the first metastatic site for different patient subcategories. In addition, we classify metastatic sites as "sponges" or "spreaders" with implications regarding anatomical pathway prediction and long-term survival. As metastatic tumors to the bone (main spreader) are most prominent, we focus in more detail on differences between groups of patients who form subsequent metastases to the lung as compared with the liver.

conclusionsWe have found that spatiotemporal patterns of metastatic spread in breast cancer are neither random nor unpredictable. Furthermore, the novel concept of classifying organ sites as sponges or spreaders may motivate experiments seeking a biological basis for these phenomena and allow us to quantify the potential consequences of therapeutic targeting of sites in the oligometastatic setting and shed light on organotropic aspects of the disease.

Identifiers

PMID28721371
PMCPMC5515198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.