ArticleCureus2017
To Stent or Not to Stent: A Tale of Two Occlusions.
Article in Cureus, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stenting and balloon angioplasty, along with mechanical thrombectomy, have gained notability as adjunctive treatment options to intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (IV-tPA) for tandem internal carotid artery (ICA) and middle cerebral artery (MCA) occlusions (TIM occlusions). Acute ischemic strokes (AISs) secondary to TIM occlusions are associated with poor patient outcomes primarily due to low recanalization rates following intravenous thrombolysis, consequently prompting the need for more invasive recanalization efforts. Often, the treatment algorithm is based on the success of the initial angioplasty, suspected volume of completed infarction, and whether or not thrombolytics are utilized. Here, we present two patients with AIS due to TIM occlusions where two different treatment modalities were implemented for recanalization efforts. Patient 1 did not receive IV-tPA and was successfully managed with balloon angioplasty and subsequent carotid stenting followed by direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) administration. Patient 2 received IV-tPA and balloon angioplasty without carotid stenting followed by intracranial mechanical thrombectomy. Complete recanalization was attained in both cases. Administration of IV-tPA can make subsequent carotid stenting a potentially higher-risk treatment option for patients with TIM due to potential hemorrhagic complications in the setting of requisite antiplatelet agents. Each case of AIS resulting from a TIM must be considered unique, and the use of IV thrombolytics, balloon angioplasty, carotid stenting, and mechanical thrombectomy alone or in combination must be tailored to the individual clinical parameters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.