Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28721179›Full record

ReviewFacts, views & vision in ObGyn2017

Early and late onset complications of gynaecologic surgery: a multimodality imaging approach.

I De Blasis, V Vinci, M E Sergi, F Capozza, M Saldari, F Moro, M C Moruzzi, A C Testa, L Manganaro

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC
In one paragraph

Review in Facts, views & vision in ObGyn, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Ultrasonography of acute retroperitoneum.Ultrasonography (Seoul, Korea) · 2024
    Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

I De BlasisCatholic University of the Sacred Heart, Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Rome.
V VinciUniversity of Rome Sapienza, Department of Radiological Sciences.
M E SergiUniversity of Rome Sapienza, Department of Radiological Sciences.
F CapozzaUniversity of Rome Sapienza, Department of Radiological Sciences.
M SaldariUniversity of Rome Sapienza, Department of Radiological Sciences.
F MoroCatholic University of the Sacred Heart, Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Rome.
M C MoruzziCatholic University of the Sacred Heart, Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Rome.
A C TestaCatholic University of the Sacred Heart, Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Rome.
L ManganaroUniversity of Rome Sapienza, Department of Radiological Sciences.
Sapienza University of Rome · ITUniversity of the Sacred Heart · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The role of imaging after surgery is pivotal to drive clinical management of early and/or late onset complications. Most frequently used imaging technique after pelvic surgery is Ultrasound (US), Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Computed Tomography (CT). While Ultrasound is a standard procedure, using grey scale and/or colour Doppler evaluation, MRI and CT scan protocols should be derived on the basis of the specific indication of the exam. Correct evaluation of female pelvis after gynaecologic surgery, having in mind the most frequent complications, is based on the correct use of the instruments and on the experience of the examiner, who should be aware of the history of the patient, type of surgery and clinical symptoms for which the exam is required; the clinician should be aware of the possibilities and limits of the different techniques, in order to choose the most appropriate imaging modality and promptly make a correct diagnosis.

Indexed as

Computed Tomography (CT)Gynaecologic surgeryMagnetic Resonance Imagingpostoperative complicationsultrasound

Identifiers

PMID28721179
PMCPMC5506770
OpenAlexW2902434843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.