Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28721085›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2017

Ambulatory and home blood pressure monitoring: gaps between clinical guidelines and clinical practice in Singapore.

Sajita Setia, Kannan Subramaniam, Boon Wee Teo, Jam Chin Tay

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of general medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Current realities of home blood pressure monitoring from physicians' perspectives: results from Asia HBPM survey 2020.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Advances in Non-Invasive Blood Pressure Monitoring.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Emergency Department-Provided Home Blood Pressure Devices Can Help Detect Undiagnosed Hypertension.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2019
    Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Guidance on home blood pressure monitoring: A statement of the HOPE Asia Network.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2018
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Sajita SetiaChief Medical Office, Medical Affairs, Pfizer Pte Ltd, Singapore.
Kannan SubramaniamGlobal Medical Affairs, Asia Pacific Region, Pfizer Australia, West Ryde, New South Wales, Australia.
Boon Wee TeoDepartment of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Jam Chin TayDepartment of General Medicine, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore.
Johnson & Johnson (Singapore) · SGNational University of Singapore · SGPfizer (Australia) · AUTan Tock Seng Hospital · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeOut-of-office blood pressure (BP) measurements (home blood pressure monitoring [HBPM] and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring [ABPM]) provide important additional information for effective hypertension detection and management decisions. Therefore, out-of-office BP measurement is now recommended by several international guidelines. This study evaluated the practice and uptake of HBPM and ABPM among physicians from Singapore. MATERIALS AND

methodsA sample of physicians from Singapore was surveyed between 8 September and 5 October 2016. Those included were in public or private practice had been practicing for ≥3 years, directly cared for patients ≥70% of the time, and treated ≥30 patients for hypertension per month. The questionnaire covered six main categories: general BP management, BP variability (BPV) awareness/diagnosis, HBPM, ABPM, BPV management, and associated training needs.

resultsSixty physicians (30 general practitioners, 20 cardiologists, and 10 nephrologists) were included (77% male, 85% aged 31-60 years, and mean 22-year practice). Physicians recommended HBPM and ABPM to 81% and 27% of hypertensive patients, respectively. HBPM was most often used to monitor antihypertensive therapy (88% of physicians) and 97% thought that ABPM was useful for providing information on BPV. HBPM instructions often differed from current guideline recommendations in terms of frequency, number of measurements, and timing. The proportion of consultation time devoted to discussing HBPM and BPV was one-quarter or less for 73% of physicians, and only 55% said that they had the ability to provide education on HBPM and BPV. Patient inertia, poor patient compliance, lack of medical consultation time, and poor patient access to a BP machine were the most common challenges for implementing out-of-office BP monitoring.

conclusionAlthough physicians from Singapore do recommend out-of-office BP measurement to patients with hypertension, this survey identified several important gaps in knowledge and clinical practice.

Indexed as

blood pressure monitoringblood pressure variabilityguidelineshypertension

Identifiers

PMID28721085
PMCPMC5501632
OpenAlexW2733092855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.