Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28721012›Full record

ArticleDrug design, development and therapy2017

Comparison of neurotoxic potency between a novel chinbotulinumtoxinA with onabotulinumtoxinA, incobotulinumtoxinA and lanbotulinumtoxinA in rats.

Ya Feng, Wuchao Liu, Lizhen Pan, Cong Jiang, Chengxi Zhang, Yuxuan Lu, Zhiyu Nie, Lingjing Jin

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Drug design, development and therapy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The mechanism of botulinum A on Raynaud syndrome.Drug design, development and therapy · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ya FengDepartment of Neurology, Shanghai Tongji Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Wuchao LiuDepartment of Neurology, Shanghai Tongji Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Lizhen PanDepartment of Neurology, Shanghai Tongji Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Cong JiangDepartment of Neurology, Shanghai Tongji Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Chengxi ZhangDepartment of Neurology, Shanghai Tongji Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Yuxuan LuDepartment of Neurology, Shanghai Tongji Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Zhiyu NieDepartment of Neurology, Shanghai Tongji Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Lingjing JinDepartment of Neurology, Shanghai Tongji Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Tongji Hospital · CNTongji University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Four botulinumtoxin type A (BoNT/A) products, onabotulinumtoxinA (A/Ona), incobotulinumtoxinA (A/Inco), lanbotulinumtoxinA (A/Lan) and chinbotulinumtoxinA (A/Chin), are applied in the present study, among which A/Chin is newly produced. We aimed to compare the neurotoxic potency of these toxins by the gauge of muscle strength reduction. Furthermore, potential molecular and cellular mechanisms were also explored. According to our data, muscle strengths in the four toxin groups were all significantly decreased after injection for 1 week. A/Chin achieved the most obvious reduction in muscle strength as compared to the other three products at the dose of 0.5 U. However, there was no difference between the four toxins when increased to 2 U. As the toxins wore off, muscle strength recovered to basal level 12 weeks postinjection. We further measured the expression levels of key factors involved in neuromuscular junction stabilization and muscle genesis. Our results showed that nicotinic acetylcholine receptor, myogenic regulatory factors and muscle-specific receptor tyrosine kinase were all significantly upregulated upon BoNT/A treatment. Consistent with the result of muscle strength, A/Chin had the most obvious induction of gene expression. Moreover, we also found local inflammation response following BoNT/A injection. Owing to lack of complexing proteins, both A/Inco and A/Chin stimulated relatively lighter inflammation compared to that of A/Ona and A/Lan groups. In conclusion, our study provided evidence for the efficacy of the novel A/Chin and its similar functional mode to that of A/Ona, A/Inco and A/Lan. In addition, A/Chin has superiority in inducing muscle paralysis and inflammation stimulation, which may indicate faster onset and longer duration of this novel A/Chin.

Indexed as

AnimalsBotulinum Toxins, Type AGene ExpressionInflammationMaleMuscle ProteinsMuscle, SkeletalMuscle StrengthNeuromuscular JunctionNeurotoxicity SyndromesParalysisRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyReceptor Protein-Tyrosine KinasesReceptors, CholinergicUp-RegulationBotulinum Toxins, Type Achinbotulinumtoxin AincobotulinumtoxinAlanbotulinumtoxin AMuscle ProteinsMuSK protein, ratReceptor Protein-Tyrosine KinasesReceptors, CholinergicA/ChinA/IncoA/LanA/Onaneurotoxic potency

Identifiers

PMID28721012
PMCPMC5500563
OpenAlexW2732623298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.