Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28720897›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

A Predictive Mathematical Modeling Approach for the Study of Doxorubicin Treatment in Triple Negative Breast Cancer.

Matthew T McKenna, Jared A Weis, Stephanie L Barnes, Darren R Tyson, Michael I Miga, Vito Quaranta, Thomas E Yankeelov

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Matthew T McKennaVanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Nashville, USA.
Jared A WeisDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9047-5514
Stephanie L BarnesDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, USA.
Darren R TysonDepartment of Cancer Biology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3272-4308
Michael I MigaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, USA.
Vito QuarantaDepartment of Cancer Biology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, USA.
Thomas E YankeelovDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, USA. thomas.yankeelov@utexas.edu.
Vanderbilt University · USLivestrong Foundation · US

Funding

MEDICAL SCIENTIST TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM007347 · NIGMS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI WILLIAMS, CHRISTOPHER S. · 1985 to 2023
$26.3M
Image Driven Multi-Scale Modeling to Predict Treatment Response in Breast CancerU01CA174706 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI QUARANTA, VITO, YANKEELOV, THOMAS E · 2013 to 2018
$2.5M
Multi-Scale Biomechanical Modeling of Tumor Growth and Response in Breast CancerK25CA204599 · NCI · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI WEIS, JARED ANTHONY · 2016 to 2020
$747k
A Computational Model-Enhanced Approach for Tumor Localization During LumpectomyR21EB022380 · NIBIB · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI MESZOELY, INGRID M, MIGA, MICHAEL IAN · 2016 to 2017
$411k
Development and Validation of a Predictive Model of Chemotherapy in Breast CancerF30CA203220 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI MCKENNA, MATTHEW T. · 2016 to 2019
$134k
NCI NIH HHS F30 CA203220NCI NIH HHS K25 CA204599NCI NIH HHS U01 CA174706NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB022380NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007347
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Doxorubicin forms the basis of chemotherapy regimens for several malignancies, including triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). Here, we present a coupled experimental/modeling approach to establish an in vitro pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model to describe how the concentration and duration of doxorubicin therapy shape subsequent cell population dynamics. This work features a series of longitudinal fluorescence microscopy experiments that characterize (1) doxorubicin uptake dynamics in a panel of TNBC cell lines, and (2) cell population response to doxorubicin over 30 days. We propose a treatment response model, fully parameterized with experimental imaging data, to describe doxorubicin uptake and predict subsequent population dynamics. We found that a three compartment model can describe doxorubicin pharmacokinetics, and pharmacokinetic parameters vary significantly among the cell lines investigated. The proposed model effectively captures population dynamics and translates well to a predictive framework. In a representative cell line (SUM-149PT) treated for 12 hours with doxorubicin, the mean percent errors of the best-fit and predicted models were 14% (±10%) and 16% (±12%), which are notable considering these statistics represent errors over 30 days following treatment. More generally, this work provides both a template for studies quantitatively investigating treatment response and a scalable approach toward predictions of tumor response in vivo.

Indexed as

BiostatisticsModels, TheoreticalAntibiotics, AntineoplasticCell Line, TumorDoxorubicinHumansLongitudinal StudiesModels, BiologicalTreatment OutcomeTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsAntibiotics, AntineoplasticDoxorubicin

Identifiers

PMID28720897
PMCPMC5516013
OpenAlexW2735309779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.