Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28720874›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Knowledge-transfer learning for prediction of matrix metalloprotease substrate-cleavage sites.

Yanan Wang, Jiangning Song, Tatiana T Marquez-Lago, André Leier, Chen Li, Trevor Lithgow, Geoffrey I Webb, Hong-Bin Shen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Machine Learning Approaches for Metalloproteins.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  3. Predicting Proteolysis in Complex Proteomes Using Deep Learning.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Yanan WangInstitute of Image Processing and Pattern Recognition, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, and Key Laboratory of System Control and Information Processing, Ministry of Education of China, Shanghai, 200240, China.
Jiangning SongMonash Centre for Data Science, Faculty of Information Technology, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, 3800, Australia.
Tatiana T Marquez-LagoInformatics Institute, School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA.
André LeierInformatics Institute, School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA.
Chen LiInfection and Immunity Program, Biomedicine Discovery Institute and Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, 3800, Australia.
Trevor LithgowInfection and Immunity Program, Biomedicine Discovery Institute and Department of Microbiology, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, 3800, Australia. Trevor.Lithgow@monash.edu.
Geoffrey I WebbMonash Centre for Data Science, Faculty of Information Technology, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, 3800, Australia. Geoff.Webb@monash.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-9963-5169
Hong-Bin ShenInstitute of Image Processing and Pattern Recognition, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, and Key Laboratory of System Control and Information Processing, Ministry of Education of China, Shanghai, 200240, China. hbshen@sjtu.edu.cn.
Monash University · AUShanghai Jiao Tong University · CNUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USARC Centre of Excellence in Advanced Molecular Imaging · AUDiscovery Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Matrix Metalloproteases (MMPs) are an important family of proteases that play crucial roles in key cellular and disease processes. Therefore, MMPs constitute important targets for drug design, development and delivery. Advanced proteomic technologies have identified type-specific target substrates; however, the complete repertoire of MMP substrates remains uncharacterized. Indeed, computational prediction of substrate-cleavage sites associated with MMPs is a challenging problem. This holds especially true when considering MMPs with few experimentally verified cleavage sites, such as for MMP-2, -3, -7, and -8. To fill this gap, we propose a new knowledge-transfer computational framework which effectively utilizes the hidden shared knowledge from some MMP types to enhance predictions of other, distinct target substrate-cleavage sites. Our computational framework uses support vector machines combined with transfer machine learning and feature selection. To demonstrate the value of the model, we extracted a variety of substrate sequence-derived features and compared the performance of our method using both 5-fold cross-validation and independent tests. The results show that our transfer-learning-based method provides a robust performance, which is at least comparable to traditional feature-selection methods for prediction of MMP-2, -3, -7, -8, -9 and -12 substrate-cleavage sites on independent tests. The results also demonstrate that our proposed computational framework provides a useful alternative for the characterization of sequence-level determinants of MMP-substrate specificity.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsSupport Vector MachineAmino Acid SequenceComputational BiologyDatabases, FactualIsoenzymesMatrix MetalloproteinasesReproducibility of ResultsSubstrate SpecificityIsoenzymesMatrix Metalloproteinases

Identifiers

PMID28720874
PMCPMC5515926
OpenAlexW2735302890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.