Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28720765›Full record

ReviewLeukemia2017

C/EBPα deregulation as a paradigm for leukemogenesis.

J A Pulikkan, D G Tenen, G Behre

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Leukemia, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. The role of tribbles homolog 2 in cell proliferation.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Integrative Proteogenomics Using ProteomeGenerator2.Journal of proteome research · 2023
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

J A PulikkanDepartment of Molecular, Cell and Cancer Biology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA.
D G TenenCancer Science Institute, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
G BehreDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Leipzig University Hospital, Leipzig, Germany.
National University Cancer Institute, Singapore · SGUniversity Hospital Leipzig · DEUniversity of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · US

Funding

Transcriptional and epigenetic heterogeneity of stem/progenitor cellsP01HL131477 · NHLBI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI David T Scadden · 2017 to 2026
$24.6M
Mechanisms of regulation by RNA in acute myeloid leukemiaR35CA197697 · NCI · BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER · PI TENEN, DANIEL G · 2015 to 2021
$7.1M
NCI NIH HHS R35 CA197697NHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL131477
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Myeloid master regulator CCAAT enhancer-binding protein alpha (C/EBPα) is deregulated by multiple mechanisms in leukemia. Inhibition of C/EBPα function plays pivotal roles in leukemogenesis. While much is known about how C/EBPα orchestrates granulopoiesis, our understanding of molecular transformation events, the role(s) of cooperating mutations and clonal evolution during C/EBPα deregulation in leukemia remains elusive. In this review, we will summarize the latest research addressing these topics with special emphasis on CEBPA mutations. We conclude by describing emerging therapeutic strategies to restore C/EBPα function.

Indexed as

AnimalsCCAAT-Enhancer-Binding Protein-alphaHematopoietic Stem CellsHumansLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteMutationCCAAT-Enhancer-Binding Protein-alpha

Identifiers

PMID28720765
PMCPMC8197657
OpenAlexW2736909003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.