Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28720713›Full record

ArticlePhysiological reports2017

Sensory processing of deep tissue nociception in the rat spinal cord and thalamic ventrobasal complex.

Shafaq Sikandar, Steven J West, Stephen B McMahon, David L Bennett, Anthony H Dickenson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physiological reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Studying IndependentThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Input-output connections of LJA5 prodynorphin neurons.The Journal of comparative neurology · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Mechanisms that drive bone pain across the lifespan.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2019
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Shafaq SikandarWolfson Institute of Biomedical Research, University College London, London, United Kingdom shafaq.sikandar@ucl.ac.uk.
Steven J WestNuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Stephen B McMahonNeurorestoration Group, Wolfson Wing Hodgkin Building, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
David L BennettNuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Anthony H DickensonNeuroscience, Physiology and Pharmacology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
John Radcliffe Hospital · GBUniversity College London · GBKing's College London · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust 102645Wellcome Trust 202747/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sensory processing of deep somatic tissue constitutes an important component of the nociceptive system, yet associated central processing pathways remain poorly understood. Here, we provide a novel electrophysiological characterization and immunohistochemical analysis of neural activation in the lateral spinal nucleus (LSN). These neurons show evoked activity to deep, but not cutaneous, stimulation. The evoked responses of neurons in the LSN can be sensitized to somatosensory stimulation following intramuscular hypertonic saline, an acute model of muscle pain, suggesting this is an important spinal relay site for the processing of deep tissue nociceptive inputs. Neurons of the thalamic ventrobasal complex (VBC) mediate both cutaneous and deep tissue sensory processing, but in contrast to the lateral spinal nucleus our electrophysiological studies do not suggest the existence of a subgroup of cells that selectively process deep tissue inputs. The sensitization of polymodal and thermospecific VBC neurons to mechanical somatosensory stimulation following acute muscle stimulation with hypertonic saline suggests differential roles of thalamic subpopulations in mediating cutaneous and deep tissue nociception in pathological states. Overall, our studies at both the spinal (lateral spinal nucleus) and supraspinal (thalamic ventrobasal complex) levels suggest a convergence of cutaneous and deep somatosensory inputs onto spinothalamic pathways, which are unmasked by activation of muscle nociceptive afferents to produce consequent phenotypic alterations in spinal and thalamic neural coding of somatosensory stimulation. A better understanding of the sensory pathways involved in deep tissue nociception, as well as the degree of labeled line and convergent pathways for cutaneous and deep somatosensory inputs, is fundamental to developing targeted analgesic therapies for deep pain syndromes.

Indexed as

NociceptionAfferent PathwaysAnimalsEvoked Potentials, SomatosensoryMaleNeuronsRatsRats, Sprague-DawleySpinal CordVentral Thalamic NucleiElectrophysiologynociception + lateral spinal nucleusthalamus

Identifiers

PMID28720713
PMCPMC5532477
OpenAlexW2737521189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.