Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28720578›Full record

ArticleGenome research2017

Systematic longitudinal survey of invasive

Teemu Kallonen, Hayley J Brodrick, Simon R Harris, Jukka Corander, Nicholas M Brown, Veronique Martin, Sharon J Peacock, Julian Parkhill

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 165 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
165citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

165 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 287 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Origin and development of twoMicrobial genomics · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. First national study on genomic profiling ofEnvironmental challenges (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2025
    Article
  20. Genomic epidemiology of third-generation cephalosporin-resistantOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2025
    Article

105 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Teemu KallonenWellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SA, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1741-6486
Hayley J BrodrickDepartment of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9914-2601
Simon R HarrisWellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SA, United Kingdom.
Jukka CoranderWellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SA, United Kingdom.
Nicholas M BrownPublic Health England, Clinical Microbiology and Public Health Laboratory, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom.
Veronique MartinBritish Society of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, Birmingham B1 3NJ, United Kingdom.
Sharon J PeacockWellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SA, United Kingdom.
Julian ParkhillWellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SA, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7069-5958
Wellcome Sanger Institute · GBBritish Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy · GBCambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBStatistics Finland · FIUniversity of Cambridge · GBUniversity of London · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Escherichia coliEscherichia coli InfectionsPhylogenyAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteremiaDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialEnglandHumansLongitudinal StudiesAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID28720578
PMCPMC5538559
OpenAlexW2735290463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.