Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28720551›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2017

Accelerating permutation testing in voxel-wise analysis through subspace tracking: A new plugin for SnPM.

Felipe Gutierrez-Barragan, Vamsi K Ithapu, Chris Hinrichs, Camille Maumet, Sterling C Johnson, Thomas E Nichols, Vikas Singh, Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Felipe Gutierrez-BarraganDepartment of Computer Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA. Electronic address: fgutierrez3@wisc.edu.
Vamsi K IthapuDepartment of Computer Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA.
Chris HinrichsDepartment of Computer Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA.
Camille MaumetDepartment of Statistics, The University of Warwick, UK(2).
Sterling C JohnsonDepartment of Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison and William S. Middleton Veteran's Hospital, USA.
Thomas E NicholsDepartment of Statistics, The University of Warwick, UK(2).
Vikas SinghDepartment of Biostatistics & Med. Informatics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA; Department of Computer Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA.
Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative

Funding

INSTITUTIONAL CTSA (UW-MADISON): CLINICAL TRIALSUL1RR025011 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI DREZNER, MARC KENNETH · 2007 to 2011
$29.5M
The Longitudinal Course of Neural Function and Amyloid in People At Risk for ADR01AG021155 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Sterling C Johnson · 2004 to 2026
$27.0M
Research Training for Computation and Informatics in Biology and MedicineT15LM007359 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Mark W. Craven, Colin Noel Dewey · 2002 to 2026
$22.6M
Wisconsin Alzheimer's Disease Research CenterP50AG033514 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI CHAPPELL, RICHARD J · 2009 to 2018
$16.2M
TrainingU54AI117924 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI CRAVEN, MARK W. · 2014 to 2018
$11.3M
Maximizing Power in AD Clinical Trials via Multimodal Machine LearningR01AG040396 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI SINGH, VIKAS · 2012 to 2015
$1.1M
Manifold-valued statistical models for longitudinal morphometic analysis in preclinical Alzheimer's disease (AD)R01EB022883 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI JOHNSON, STERLING C, SINGH, VIKAS · 2016 to 2018
$995k
NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR025011NIAID NIH HHS U54 AI117924NIA NIH HHS P50 AG033514NIA NIH HHS R01 AG021155NIA NIH HHS R01 AG040396NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB022883NLM NIH HHS T15 LM007359Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 100309/Z/12/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Permutation testing is a non-parametric method for obtaining the max null distribution used to compute corrected p-values that provide strong control of false positives. In neuroimaging, however, the computational burden of running such an algorithm can be significant. We find that by viewing the permutation testing procedure as the construction of a very large permutation testing matrix, T, one can exploit structural properties derived from the data and the test statistics to reduce the runtime under certain conditions. In particular, we see that T is low-rank plus a low-variance residual. This makes T a good candidate for low-rank matrix completion, where only a very small number of entries of T (∼0.35% of all entries in our experiments) have to be computed to obtain a good estimate. Based on this observation, we present RapidPT, an algorithm that efficiently recovers the max null distribution commonly obtained through regular permutation testing in voxel-wise analysis. We present an extensive validation on a synthetic dataset and four varying sized datasets against two baselines: Statistical NonParametric Mapping (SnPM13) and a standard permutation testing implementation (referred as NaivePT). We find that RapidPT achieves its best runtime performance on medium sized datasets (50≤n≤200), with speedups of 1.5× - 38× (vs. SnPM13) and 20x-1000× (vs. NaivePT). For larger datasets (n≥200) RapidPT outperforms NaivePT (6× - 200×) on all datasets, and provides large speedups over SnPM13 when more than 10000 permutations (2× - 15×) are needed. The implementation is a standalone toolbox and also integrated within SnPM13, able to leverage multi-core architectures when available.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsBrainHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedNeuroimagingStatistics, NonparametricHypothesis testMatrix completionPermutation testVoxel-wise analysis

Identifiers

PMID28720551
PMCPMC5671355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.