Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28720442›Full record

ArticlePapillomavirus research (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2017

Impact of baseline covariates on the immunogenicity of the 9-valent HPV vaccine - A combined analysis of five phase III clinical trials.

Lone K Petersen, Jaime Restrepo, Edson D Moreira, Ole-Erik Iversen, Punnee Pitisuttithum, Pierre Van Damme, Elmar A Joura, Sven-Erik Olsson, Daron Ferris, Stan Block and 14 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Papillomavirus research (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Immune Responses to Human Papillomavirus After Infection and Vaccination.Current topics in microbiology and immunology · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 16 institutions in 11 countries.

Lone K PetersenAarhus University Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aarhus, Denmark.
Jaime RestrepoFundación Centro de Investigación Clínica CIC, Medellín, Colombia.
Edson D MoreiraAssociação Obras Sociais Irmã Dulce and Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Brazilian Ministry of Health, Bahia, Brazil.
Ole-Erik IversenDepartment of Clinical Science, University of Bergen and Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Punnee PitisuttithumFaculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand.
Pierre Van DammeCenter for the Evaluation of Vaccination, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Elmar A JouraMedical University of Vienna, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna, Austria.
Sven-Erik OlssonKarolinska Institute at Danderyd Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Daron FerrisDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Georgia Regents University, Augusta, GA, USA.
Stan BlockKentucky Pediatric and Adult Research, Inc., Bardstown, KY, USA.
Anna R GiulianoMoffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.
Xavier BoschCatalan Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain.
Sophie PilsMedical University of Vienna, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna, Austria.
Jack CuzickWolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, London, UK.
Suzanne M GarlandRoyal Women's Hospital, University of Melbourne and Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Warner HuhDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Alabama, Birmingham, USA.
Susanne K KjaerDanish Cancer Society Research Center and Department of Gynecology, Rigshospitalet, Denmark.
Oliver M BautistaMerck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA.
Donna HyattMerck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA.
Roger MaanssonMerck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA.
Erin MoellerMerck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA.
Hong QiMerck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA.
Christine RobertsMerck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA.
Alain LuxembourgMerck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA. Electronic address: alain_luxembourg@merck.com.
Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) · USMedical University of Vienna · ATAarhus University Hospital · DKAugusta University · USDanish Cancer Society · DKFundação Oswaldo Cruz · BRInstitut Català d'Oncologia · ESKarolinska Institutet · SEMahidol University · THMoffitt Cancer Center · USMurdoch Children's Research Institute · AUOhio Pediatric Research Association · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USUniversity of Antwerp · BEUniversity of Bergen · NOWolfson Foundation · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 16891
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe immunogenicity profile of the 9-valent HPV (9vHPV) vaccine was evaluated across five phase III clinical studies conducted in girls and boys 9-15 years of age and young women 16-26 years of age. The effect of baseline characteristics of subjects on vaccine-induced HPV antibody responses was assessed.

methodsImmunogenicity data from 11,304 subjects who received ≥1 dose of 9vHPV vaccine in five Phase III studies were analyzed. Vaccine was administered as a 3-dose regimen. HPV antibody titers were assessed 1 month after dose 3 using a competitive Luminex immunoassay and summarized as geometric mean titers (GMTs). Covariates examined were age, gender, race, region of residence, and HPV serostatus and PCR status at day 1.

resultsGMTs to all 9 vaccine HPV types decreased with age at vaccination initiation, and were otherwise generally similar among the demographic subgroups defined by gender, race and region of residence. For all subgroups defined by race or region of residence, GMTs were higher in girls and boys than in young women. Vaccination of subjects who were seropositive at day 1 to a vaccine HPV type resulted in higher GMTs to that type, compared with those in subjects who were seronegative for that type at day 1.

conclusions9vHPV vaccine immunogenicity was robust among subjects with differing baseline characteristics. It was generally comparable across subjects of different races and from different regions. Greater immunogenicity in girls and boys versus young women (the population used to establish 9vHPV vaccine efficacy in clinical studies) indicates that the anti-HPV responses generated by the vaccine in adolescents from all races or regions were sufficient to induce high-level protective efficacy. This immunogenicity profile supports a widespread 9vHPV vaccination program and early vaccination.

Indexed as

9v HPV vaccineClinical trialHuman papillomavirusImmunogenicityNCT00543543NCT00943722NCT00988884NCT01073293NCT01304498V503-001V503-002V503-005V503-007V503-009/GDS01C

Identifiers

PMID28720442
PMCPMC5883201
OpenAlexW2597072238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.