ArticleExperimental eye research2017
Direct measurement of pressure-independent aqueous humour flow using iPerfusion.
Article in Experimental eye research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Consensus Recommendations for Studies of Outflow Facility and Intraocular Pressure Regulation Using Ex Vivo Perfusion Approaches.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2024Article
- Modeling complex age-related eye disease.Progress in retinal and eye research · 2024Review
- Measurement of postmortem outflow facility using iPerfusion.Experimental eye research · 2022Article
- Consensus Recommendation for Mouse Models of Ocular Hypertension to Study Aqueous Humor Outflow and Its Mechanisms.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2022Review
- Anterior Segment Anatomy and Conventional Outflow Physiology of the Tree Shrew (Tupaia belangeri).Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2022Article
- Deletion of the gene encoding prostamide/prostaglandin F synthase reveals an important role in regulating intraocular pressure.Prostaglandins, leukotrienes, and essential fatty acids · 2021Article
- Aqueous Humor Outflow Requires Active Cellular Metabolism in Mice.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2020Article
- Age and Menopause Effects on Ocular Compliance and Aqueous Outflow.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2020Article
- Intracranial pressure modulates aqueous humour dynamics of the eye.The Journal of physiology · 2020Article
- Detection and characterization of tree shrew retinal venous pulsations: An animal model to study human retinal venous pulsations.Experimental eye research · 2019Article
- Measurement of Ocular Compliance Using iPerfusion.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2019Article
- Aqueous Humor Dynamics of the Brown-Norway Rat.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Reduction of intraocular pressure is the sole therapeutic target for glaucoma. Intraocular pressure is determined by the dynamics of aqueous humour secretion and outflow, which comprise several pressure-dependent and pressure-independent mechanisms. Accurately quantifying the components of aqueous humour dynamics is essential in understanding the pathology of glaucoma and the development of new treatments. To better characterise aqueous humour dynamics, we propose a method to directly measure pressure-independent aqueous humour flow. Using the iPerfusion system, we directly measure the flow into the eye when the pressure drop across the pressure-dependent pathways is eliminated. Using this approach we address i) the magnitude of pressure-independent flow in ex vivo eyes, ii) whether we can accurately measure an artificially imposed pressure-independent flow, and iii) whether the presence of a pressure-independent flow affects our ability to measure outflow facility. These studies are conducted in mice, which are a common animal model for aqueous humour dynamics. In eyes perfused with a single cannula, the average pressure-independent flow was 1 [-3, 5] nl/min (mean [95% confidence interval]) (N = 6). Paired ex vivo eyes were then cannulated with two needles, connecting the eye to both iPerfusion and a syringe pump, which was used to impose a known pressure-independent flow of 120 nl/min into the experimental eye only. The measured pressure-independent flow was then 121 [117, 125] nl/min (N = 7), indicating that the method could measure pressure-independent flow with high accuracy. Finally, we showed that the artificially imposed pressure-independent flow did not affect our ability to measure facility, provided that the pressure-dependence of facility and the true pressure-independent flow were accounted for. The present study provides a robust method for measurement of pressure-independent flow, and demonstrates the importance of accurately quantifying this parameter when investigating pressure-dependent flow or outflow facility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.