Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28720399›Full record

ReviewSeminars in fetal & neonatal medicine2017

Prenatal and postnatal administration of prebiotics and probiotics.

Kristin Sohn, Mark A Underwood

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in fetal & neonatal medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Observational
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. The Role ofJournal of clinical medicine · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Impact of maternalFrontiers in immunology · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kristin SohnDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Mark A UnderwoodDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA, USA. Electronic address: munderwood@ucdavis.edu.
University of California, Davis · US

Funding

Necrotizing Enterocolitis: Prevention and PredictionR01HD059127 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI LEBRILLA, CARLITO B, MILLS, DAVID ANDREW · 2008 to 2012
$3.1M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD059127
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colonization of the neonatal gut by beneficial bacteria is important for the establishment and maintenance of the mucosal barrier, thus protecting the neonate from enteric pathogens and local and systemic inflammation. The neonatal microbiome is influenced by infant diet, environment, and the maternal microbiome. Dysbiosis in pregnancy increases the risk of pre-eclampsia, diabetes, infection, preterm labor, and later childhood atopy. Dysbiosis of the neonatal gut plays an important role in colic in the term infant, in the disease processes which plague preterm infants, including necrotizing enterocolitis and sepsis, and in the long-term outcomes of neonates. Administration of enteral prebiotics, probiotics, and synbiotics during pregnancy, lactation, and postnatal life appears to be a safe and feasible method to alter the maternal and neonatal microbiome, thus improving pregnancy and neonatal outcomes.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomePrebioticsProbioticsDysbiosisFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancyPrebioticsAllergic rhinitisAtopic dermatitisDiabetes mellitusMetabolic syndromeMicrobiotaNecrotizing enterocolitisPregnancyPrematurity

Identifiers

PMID28720399
PMCPMC5618799
OpenAlexW2734706955

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.