Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28720130›Full record

Trial reportBMC cancer2017

Psychosocial and behavioral impact of breast cancer risk assessed by testing for common risk variants: protocol of a prospective study.

Tatiane Yanes, Bettina Meiser, Mary-Anne Young, Rajneesh Kaur, Gillian Mitchell, Kristine Barlow-Stewart, Tony Roscioli, Jane Halliday, Paul James

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC cancer, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Breast cancer polygenic risk scores: a 12-month prospective study of patient reported outcomes and risk management behavior.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2021
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Tatiane YanesPrince of Wales Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia. t.yanes@student.unsw.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3905-3025
Bettina MeiserPrince of Wales Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia.
Mary-Anne YoungGenome.One, Garvan Institute, Sydney, NSW, 2010, Australia.
Rajneesh KaurPrince of Wales Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia.
Gillian MitchellFamilial Cancer Service, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia.
Kristine Barlow-StewartNorthern Clinical School, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2065, Australia.
Tony RoscioliDepartment of Medical Genetics, Sydney Children's Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Jane HallidayPublic Health Genetics, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, 3052, Australia.
Paul JamesFamilial Cancer Service, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia.
UNSW Sydney · AUThe University of Melbourne · AUGarvan Institute of Medical Research · AUPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre · AUSydney Children's Hospital · AUThe University of Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe 'common variant, common disease' model predicts that a significant component of hereditary breast cancer unexplained by pathogenic variants in moderate or high-penetrance genes is due to the cumulative effect of common risk variants in DNA (polygenic risk). Assessing a woman's breast cancer risk by testing for common risk variants can provide useful information for women who would otherwise receive uninformative results by traditional monogenic testing. Despite increasing support for the utility of common risk variants in hereditary breast cancer, research findings have not yet been integrated into clinical practice. Translational research is therefore critical to ensure results are effectively communicated, and that women do not experience undue adverse psychological outcomes.

methodsIn this prospective study, 400 women with a personal and/or high risk family history of breast cancer will be recruited from six familial cancer centers (FCCs) in Australia. Eligible women will be invited to attend a FCC and receive their personal polygenic risk result for breast cancer. Genetic health professionals participating in the study will receive training on the return of polygenic risk information and a training manual and visual aids will be developed to facilitate patient communication. Participants will complete up to three self-administered questionnaires over a 12-months period to assess the short-and long-term psychological and behavioral outcomes of receiving or not receiving their personal polygenic risk result. DISCUSSION: This is the world's first study to assess the psychological and behavioral impact of offering polygenic risk information to women from families at high risk of breast cancer. Findings from this research will provide the basis for the development of a new service model to provide polygenic risk information in familial cancer clinics.

trial registrationThe study was retrospectively registered on 27th April 2017 with the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Group (Registration no: ACTRN12617000594325; clinical trial URL: https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=372743 ).

Indexed as

AdultAgedAustraliaBreast NeoplasmsFemaleGenetic CounselingHumansMiddle AgedNew ZealandPolymorphism, Single NucleotideProspective StudiesRisk FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesBehavioral outcomesBreast cancerGenetic counsellingGenomic testingPolygenic riskPsychosocialSingle nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)

Identifiers

PMID28720130
PMCPMC5516374
OpenAlexW2738992628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.