Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28719977›Full record

Trial reportClinical rehabilitation2018

The efficacy of interactive, motion capture-based rehabilitation on functional outcomes in an inpatient stroke population: a randomized controlled trial.

John Cannell, Emelyn Jovic, Amy Rathjen, Kylie Lane, Anna M Tyson, Michele L Callisaya, Stuart T Smith, Kiran Dk Ahuja, Marie-Louise Bird

Abstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical rehabilitation, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Virtual reality for stroke rehabilitation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Virtual Reality Therapy for Upper Limb Motor Impairments in Patients With Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Systematic review of novel technology-based interventions for ischemic stroke.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2021
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Wearable Loop Sensors for Knee Flexion Monitoring: Dynamic Measurements on Human Subjects.IEEE open journal of engineering in medicine and biology · 2024
    Article
  17. Machine Learning in Clinical Trials: A Primer with Applications to Neurology.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2023
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Digital therapeutics in neurology.Journal of neurology · 2022
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

John Cannell1 Faculty of Health, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia.
Emelyn Jovic1 Faculty of Health, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia.
Amy Rathjen1 Faculty of Health, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia.
Kylie Lane1 Faculty of Health, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia.
Anna M Tyson1 Faculty of Health, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia.
Michele L Callisaya3 Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia.
Stuart T Smith4 Southern Cross University, Lismore, NSW, Australia.
Kiran Dk Ahuja1 Faculty of Health, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia.
Marie-Louise Bird1 Faculty of Health, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare the efficacy of novel interactive, motion capture-rehabilitation software to usual care stroke rehabilitation on physical function.

designRandomized controlled clinical trial.

settingTwo subacute hospital rehabilitation units in Australia.

participantsIn all, 73 people less than six months after stroke with reduced mobility and clinician determined capacity to improve.

interventionsBoth groups received functional retraining and individualized programs for up to an hour, on weekdays for 8-40 sessions (dose matched). For the intervention group, this individualized program used motivating virtual reality rehabilitation and novel gesture controlled interactive motion capture software. For usual care, the individualized program was delivered in a group class on one unit and by rehabilitation assistant 1:1 on the other. MAIN MEASURES: Primary outcome was standing balance (functional reach). Secondary outcomes were lateral reach, step test, sitting balance, arm function, and walking.

resultsParticipants (mean 22 days post-stroke) attended mean 14 sessions. Both groups improved (mean (95% confidence interval)) on primary outcome functional reach (usual care 3.3 (0.6 to 5.9), intervention 4.1 (-3.0 to 5.0) cm) with no difference between groups ( P = 0.69) on this or any secondary measures. No differences between the rehabilitation units were seen except in lateral reach (less affected side) ( P = 0.04). No adverse events were recorded during therapy.

conclusionInteractive, motion capture rehabilitation for inpatients post stroke produced functional improvements that were similar to those achieved by usual care stroke rehabilitation, safely delivered by either a physical therapist or a rehabilitation assistant.

Indexed as

AgedAustraliaExercise TherapyFeasibility StudiesFemaleGait Disorders, NeurologicHumansInpatientsMaleMiddle AgedPostural BalancePrognosisRecovery of FunctionRehabilitation CentersRisk AssessmentSingle-Blind MethodexerciseFeasibilityself-managementtechnologyvirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID28719977
PMCPMC5777543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.