Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28719856›Full record

ArticleColloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces2017

Contribution of Kupffer cells to liposome accumulation in the liver.

Emma Samuelsson, Haifa Shen, Elvin Blanco, Mauro Ferrari, Joy Wolfram

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Colloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Mannosamine-Modified Poly(lactic-Bioconjugate chemistry · 2025
    Article
  14. Sorafenib-Drug Delivery Strategies in Primary Liver Cancer.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025
    Review
  15. Pooled Nanoparticle Screening Using a Chemical Barcoding Approach.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Emma SamuelssonDepartment of Nanomedicine, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Haifa ShenDepartment of Nanomedicine, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Elvin BlancoDepartment of Nanomedicine, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Mauro FerrariDepartment of Nanomedicine, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY 10065, USA. Electronic address: mferrari@houstonmethodist.org.
Joy WolframDepartment of Nanomedicine, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Department of Transplantation, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA. Electronic address: jvwolfram@houstonmethodist.org.

Funding

Texas Center for Cancer NanomedicineU54CA151668 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI FERRARI, MAURO · 2010 to 2014
$12.4M
TRANS-NETWORK PROJECTSU54CA143837 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI FERRARI, MAURO · 2009 to 2014
$10.8M
Transport Oncophysics CoreU54CA210181 · NCI · METHODIST HOSPITAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI CHANG, JENNY C-N · 2016 to 2020
$9.3M
NCI NIH HHS U54 CA143837NCI NIH HHS U54 CA151668NCI NIH HHS U54 CA210181
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The liver is a major barrier for site-specific delivery of systemically injected nanoparticles, as up to 90% of the dose is usually captured by this organ. Kupffer cells are thought to be the main cellular component responsible for nanoparticle accumulation in the liver. These resident macrophages form part of the mononuclear phagocyte system, which recognizes and engulfs foreign bodies in the circulatory system. In this study, we have compared two strategies for reducing nanoparticle accumulation in the liver, in order to investigate the specific contribution of Kupffer cells. Specifically, we have performed a comparison of the capability of pegylation and Kupffer cell depletion to reduce liposome accumulation in the liver. Pegylation reduces nanoparticle interactions with all types of cells and can serve as a control for elucidating the role of specific cell populations in liver accumulation. The results indicate that liposome pegylation is a more effective strategy for avoiding liver uptake compared to depletion of Kupffer cells, suggesting that nanoparticle interactions with other cells in the liver may also play a contributing role. This study highlights the need for a more complete understanding of factors that mediate nanoparticle accumulation in the liver and for the exploration of microenvironmental modulation strategies for reducing nanoparticle-cell interactions in this organ.

Indexed as

AnimalsHumansKupffer CellsLiposomesLiverMacrophagesNanoparticlesLiposomesKupffer cellsLiverMacrophagesMononuclear phagocyte systemNanoparticlesPegylation

Identifiers

PMID28719856
PMCPMC5645238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.