Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28719066›Full record

ArticleDiabetes, obesity & metabolism2018

Insights into optimal basal insulin titration in type 2 diabetes: Results of a quantitative survey.

Lori Berard, Mireille Bonnemaire, Marie Mical, Steve Edelman

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Expert Opinion on Optimizing Suboptimal Basal Insulin Titration in India: Addressing Challenges and Leveraging Digital Solutions.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Impact of My Dose Coach App Frequency of Use on Clinical Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2022
    Article
  17. Clinical Use of Insulin Glargine 300 U/mL in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes: Hypothetical Case Studies.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Effect of Baseline Characteristics on Hypoglycaemia Risk with Insulin Glargine 100 U/mL: Post Hoc Analysis of the BEYOND 7 Study.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2021
    Article
  20. Evaluation of Clinical Outcomes With the V-Go Wearable Insulin Delivery Device in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes.Clinical diabetes : a publication of the American Diabetes Association · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Lori BerardWinnipeg Regional Health Authority Health Sciences Centre, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9695-2094
Mireille BonnemaireSanofi, Paris, France.
Marie MicalSanofi, Paris, France.
Steve EdelmanUniversity of California, San Diego, California.
Sanofi (France) · FRUniversity of California San Diego · USWinnipeg Regional Health Authority · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsBasal insulin (BI) treatment initiation and dose titration in type 2 diabetes (T2DM) are often delayed. Such "clinical inertia" results in poor glycaemic control and high risk of long-term complications. This survey aimed to determine healthcare professional (HCP) and patient attitudes to BI initiation and titration.

methodsAn online survey (July-August 2015) including HCPs and patients with T2DM in the USA, France and Germany. Patients were ≥18 years old and had been on BI for 6 to 36 months, or discontinued BI within the previous 12 months.

resultsParticipants comprised 386 HCPs and 318 people with T2DM. While >75% of HCPs reported discussing titration at the initiation visit, only 16% to 28% of patients remembered such discussions, many (32%-42%) were unaware of the need to titrate BI, and only 28% to 39% recalled mention of the time needed to reach glycaemic goals. Most HCPs and patients agreed that more effective support tools to assist BI initiation/titration are needed; patients indicated that provision of such tools would increase confidence in self-titration. HCPs identified fear of hypoglycaemia, failure to titrate in the absence of symptoms, and low patient motivation as important titration barriers. In contrast, patients identified weight gain, the perception that titration meant worsening disease, frustration over the time to reach HbA1c goals and fear of hypoglycaemia as major factors.

conclusionA disconnect exists between HCP- and patient-perceived barriers to effective BI titration. To optimize titration, strategies should be targeted to improve HCP-patient communication, and provide support and educational tools.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAttitude of Health PersonnelDiabetes ComplicationsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Dose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug MonitoringFemaleFranceGermanyGlycated HemoglobinHealth Care SurveysHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansHyperglycemiaHypoglycemiaGlycated Hemoglobinhemoglobin A1c protein, humanHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinbasal insulininsulin analoguesinsulin therapytype 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID28719066
PMCPMC5811840
OpenAlexW2739009446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.