Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28718055›Full record

ArticleJournal of cardiovascular translational research2017

Early Anti-inflammatory and Pro-angiogenic Myocardial Effects of Intravenous Serelaxin Infusion for 72 H in an Experimental Rat Model of Acute Myocardial Infarction.

Jesus Sanchez-Mas, Antonio Lax, Mari C Asensio-Lopez, Miriam Lencina, Maria J Fernandez-Del Palacio, Angela Soriano-Filiu, Rudolf A de Boer, Domingo A Pascual-Figal

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cardiovascular translational research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Adipokines and Inflammation: Focus on Cardiovascular Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Jesus Sanchez-MasInstituto Murciano de Investigación Biomédica (IMIB), Facultad de Medicina, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.
Antonio LaxInstituto Murciano de Investigación Biomédica (IMIB), Facultad de Medicina, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.
Mari C Asensio-LopezInstituto Murciano de Investigación Biomédica (IMIB), Facultad de Medicina, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.
Miriam LencinaPathological Anatomy Department, Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain.
Maria J Fernandez-Del PalacioVeterinary Teaching Hospital, Veterinary Medicine and Surgery Department, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.
Angela Soriano-FiliuInstituto Murciano de Investigación Biomédica (IMIB), Facultad de Medicina, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.
Rudolf A de BoerDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Domingo A Pascual-FigalInstituto Murciano de Investigación Biomédica (IMIB), Facultad de Medicina, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain. dpascual@um.es.
Universidad de Murcia · ESCentro de Investigación en Red en Enfermedades Cardiovasculares · ESHospital Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca · ESUniversidad Cardenal Herrera CEU · ESUniversity of Groningen · NL

Funding

Instituto de Salud Carlos III CD13/00032Instituto de Salud Carlos III INT16/00172Instituto de Salud Carlos III PI14/01637
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sprague Dawley rats were subjected to acute myocardial infarction (AMI) by permanent ligation of the left anterior descending coronary artery. At the time of AMI, a subcutaneous mini-osmotic pump was implanted and animals were randomized into three groups, according to the intravenous therapy received during the first 72 h: placebo-treated (saline), serelaxin10-treated (SRLX10 = 10 μg/kg/day), or serelaxin30-treated (SRLX30 = 30 μg/kg/day). Treatment with SRLX30 reduced the expression of inflammatory cytokines and chemokines, as well as the infiltration of macrophages, and increased the expression of pro-angiogenic markers and vessel density in the infarcted myocardium after 7 days. SRLX30 did not reduce early myocardial fibrosis but reduced myocardial levels of sST2 and galectin-3. No significant effects were observed with SRLX10 treatment. A significant correlation was observed between plasma levels of serelaxin and effect measures. The results suggest serelaxin has a protective effect in early processes of cardiac remodeling after AMI.

Indexed as

Angiogenesis Inducing AgentsAngiogenic ProteinsAnimalsAnti-Inflammatory AgentsDisease Models, AnimalDose-Response Relationship, DrugFibrosisGalectin 3Inflammation MediatorsInfusions, IntravenousMaleMyocardial InfarctionMyocardiumNeovascularization, PhysiologicRats, Sprague-DawleyReceptors, Interleukin-1Angiogenesis Inducing AgentsAngiogenic ProteinsAnti-Inflammatory AgentsGalectin 3Inflammation MediatorsReceptors, Interleukin-1Recombinant ProteinsRelaxinserelaxin protein, humanST2 protein, ratFibrosisLeft ventricular systolic dysfunctionMyocardial infarctionRemodelingSerelaxin

Identifiers

PMID28718055
OpenAlexW2734815609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.