Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28718049›Full record

Trial reportPharmaceutical research2017

Good Things in Small Packages: an Innovative Delivery Approach for Inhaled Insulin.

James B Fink, Lisa Molloy, John S Patton, Valdecir Castor Galindo-Filho, Jacqueline de Melo Barcelar, Luciana Alcoforado, Simone Cristina Soares Brandão, Armèle Dornelas de Andrade

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Pharmaceutical research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. A Review: The Prospect of Inhaled Insulin Therapy via Vibrating Mesh Technology to Treat Diabetes.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Review
  8. Devices for Improved Delivery of Nebulized Pharmaceutical Aerosols to the Lungs.Journal of aerosol medicine and pulmonary drug delivery · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

James B FinkDance Biopharm Inc., 150 N. Hill Dr., Suite 24, Brisbane, California, 94005, USA. jfink@dancebiopharm.com.
Lisa MolloyDance Biopharm Inc., 150 N. Hill Dr., Suite 24, Brisbane, California, 94005, USA.
John S PattonDance Biopharm Inc., 150 N. Hill Dr., Suite 24, Brisbane, California, 94005, USA.
Valdecir Castor Galindo-FilhoDepartment of Physiotherapy, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil.
Jacqueline de Melo BarcelarDepartment of Physiotherapy, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil.
Luciana AlcoforadoDepartment of Physiotherapy, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil.
Simone Cristina Soares BrandãoDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Hospital das Clínicas de Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil.
Armèle Dornelas de AndradeDepartment of Physiotherapy, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil.

Funding

Universidade Federal de Pernambuco This study was funded by a grant CNPq-PVE-400801/2013-2, FACEPE APQ 0234-4.08/12
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe design development of a small, hand held, battery operated, breath actuated inhaler as a drug/device platform for inhaled insulin posed a number of technical challenges. Our goal was to optimize lung deposition and distribution with aerosol generators producing 3-6 μm particle size distribution.

methodsIn silico modeling with computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and in vitro testing of device components were assessed using an Alberta idealized adult airway (Copley, UK) to optimize mouthpiece and aerosol path design for dose delivered distal to the trachea. Human factors use testing was designed to determine the ability to perform inspiratory manuevers with LED guidance within target flow limits. In vivo testing with healthy normal subjects of radiolabeled aerosol compared 2 breathing patterns for lung deposition efficiency, distribution, and subject preference.

resultsCFD demonstrated that flows ≤5 L/min and ≥15 L/min reduced the delivery efficiencg. Prototypes tested with inspiratory flow of 10 L/min provided up to 70% of dose delivered distal to the model throat with aerosols of 3 to 6 μm. Users guided by LED were able to inhale for 8-24 s with 5 s breath hold. Lung dose >70% with peripheral to central ratios >2.0 were achieved, with subject preference for the longer inspiratory time with breath hold.

conclusionThe device design phase integration led to a novel design and inspiratory pattern with greater levels of peripheral deposition than previously reported with commercial inhalers. The rationale and process of the application of these methods are described with implications for use in future device development.

Indexed as

Administration, InhalationAdultAerosolsAgedComputer SimulationCross-Over StudiesEquipment DesignFemaleHumansHydrodynamicsHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinLungMaleMiddle AgedNebulizers and VaporizersAerosolsHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinaerosolbreathing patternsdevice designhuman factorsinhaled insulin

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.