Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28717972›Full record

ArticleEating and weight disorders : EWD2019

Characteristics of patients in an eating disorder sample who dropped out: 2-year follow-up.

Andrés Gómez Del Barrio, María Yolanda Vellisca Gonzalez, Jana González Gómez, José Ignacio Latorre Marín, Laura Carral-Fernández, Santos Orejudo Hernandez, Inés Madrazo Río-Hortega, Laura Moreno Malfaz

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Eating and weight disorders : EWD, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Andrés Gómez Del BarrioHospital Universitario "Marqués de Valdecilla", Unidad de Trastornos de la Conducta Alimentaria, Avda, Valdecilla s/n, 39008, Santander, Spain. andresgomez@humv.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0843-2575
María Yolanda Vellisca GonzalezUniversity of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.
Jana González GómezHospital Universitario "Marqués de Valdecilla", Unidad de Trastornos de la Conducta Alimentaria, Avda, Valdecilla s/n, 39008, Santander, Spain.
José Ignacio Latorre MarínObispo Polanco Hospital, Teruel, Spain.
Laura Carral-FernándezHospital Universitario "Marqués de Valdecilla", Unidad de Trastornos de la Conducta Alimentaria, Avda, Valdecilla s/n, 39008, Santander, Spain.
Santos Orejudo HernandezUniversity of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.
Inés Madrazo Río-HortegaHospital Universitario "Marqués de Valdecilla", Unidad de Trastornos de la Conducta Alimentaria, Avda, Valdecilla s/n, 39008, Santander, Spain.
Laura Moreno MalfazGreat Ormond Street Hospital for Children, NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis manuscript explores the characteristics of individuals diagnosed with an eating disorder who dropped out of treatment, compared with those who completed it.

methodThe participants were 196 patients diagnosed with eating disorders (according to DSM-IV-TR criteria) who consecutively began treatment for the first time in an eating disorders unit. They were assessed at baseline with a set of questionnaires evaluating eating habits, temperament, and general psychopathology. During the follow-up period, patients who dropped out were re-assessed via a telephone interview.

resultsIn the course of a 2-year follow-up, a total of 80 (40.8%) patients were labeled as dropouts, and 116 (59.2%) remaining subjects were considered completers. High TCI scores in the character dimensions of Disorderliness (NS4) (p < .01) and total Novelty Seeking (NST), along with low scores in Dependency (RD4), were significantly associated with dropout in the course of 2 years. Once the results were submitted to logistic regression analysis, dropout only remained associated with high scores in Disorderliness (NS4) and, inversely, with an initial Anorexia Nervosa (AN) diagnosis (p < .05). Reasons for dropout stated by the patients included logistic difficulties, subjective improvement of their condition, and lack of motivation. DISCUSSION: Clinicians should handle the first therapeutic intervention with particular care in order to enhance their understanding of clients and their ability to rapidly identify those who are at risk of dropping out of treatment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III: Cohort Study.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAnxietyFeeding and Eating DisordersFeeding BehaviorFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMalePatient DropoutsPersonalitySurveys and QuestionnairesTemperamentYoung AdultDropoutEating disordersFollow-upOutcome

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.