ArticleWorld journal of surgery2017
Survival Benefits of Surgical Resection in Patients with Recurrent Biliary Tract Carcinoma.
Article in World journal of surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Long-Term Survivor of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma for over 18 Years: Case Study with Longitudinal Histo-molecular and Tumor Immune Microenvironment Characterization and Systematic Review of the Literature.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2024Pooled it
- Effect of local treatment in patients with oligo-recurrence after surgery of distal bile duct cancer: A bi-institutional study.Cancer medicine · 2023Article
- Lenvatinib Beyond First-Line Therapy in Patients With Advanced Biliary Tract Carcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWhether surgical resection for recurrent biliary tract carcinoma (BTC) prolongs survival and the patients who are most likely to benefit from such treatment remain unclear.
methodsAmong 251 patients with recurrences after the initial resection of BTC, a total of 21 patients (8.4%) underwent surgical resection for the recurrence, with a zero mortality rate. The clinicopathological features of these patients were compared with those of patients who did not undergo surgery.
resultsThe median survival time (MST) after the first recurrence and the 5-year post-recurrent survival (PRS) rate were 19.8 months and 32.8%, respectively, for patients who underwent re-resection. Fourteen patients (66.7%) experienced second recurrences; however, none of these patients underwent further surgical resection. Surgical resection for recurrence was identified as an independent prognostic factor for survival after recurrence (hazard ratio of 0.33, 95% CI of 0.17-0.58, p < 0.001). Patients with less than three liver metastases had a significantly better PRS after surgical resection than after chemotherapy (p = 0.015). Among the patients with an isolated solitary liver metastasis, patients who underwent resection had a significantly longer MST after the first recurrence than patients receiving chemotherapy (22.8 vs. 10.9 months, p = 0.025), whereas the PRS was similar between the two groups among patients with two liver lesions.
conclusionsSurgical resection for recurrent BTC may prolong survival in highly selected patients. A hepatectomy might offer a survival benefit for patients with a solitary liver metastasis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.