Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28717899›Full record

Trial reportJournal of general internal medicine2017

The Effects of Public Disclosure of Industry Payments to Physicians on Patient Trust: A Randomized Experiment.

Alison R Hwong, Sunita Sah, Lisa Soleymani Lehmann

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of general internal medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02179632 (Disclosure of Industry Payments to Physicians and the Patient-Doctor Relationship), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02179632 nacompletednot on this map

Disclosure of Industry Payments to Physicians and the Patient-Doctor Relationship

TypeinterventionalSponsorHarvard Medical School (HMS and HSDM)Ran2014 to 2014Enrolled278ConditionsPatient Doctor TrustArmsExposure to disclosure website
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Navigating the challenges of initiating pediatric device trials - a case study.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Measuring Trust in Primary Care.The Milbank quarterly · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Pharmaceutical Sales Representatives in the United States and China: The Need for Professional Public Space.Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review of Industry Payments to General Orthopaedic Surgeons Reported by the Open Payments Database: 2014 to 2019.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2021
    Article
  11. French Public Familiarity and Attitudes toward Clinical Research during the COVID-19 Pandemic.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Towards Patient-Centered Conflicts of Interest Policy.International journal of health policy and management · 2018
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Alison R HwongDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. alison.hwong@ucsf.edu.
Sunita SahJohnson Graduate School of Management, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Lisa Soleymani LehmannDepartment of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Cornell University · USNational Center for PTSD · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFinancial ties between physicians and the pharmaceutical and medical device industry are common, but little is known about how patient trust is affected by these ties.

objectiveThe purpose of this study was to evaluate how viewing online public disclosure of industry payments affects patients' trust ratings for physicians, the medical profession, and the pharmaceutical and medical device industry.

designThis was a randomized experimental evaluation.

participantsThere were 278 English-speaking participants over age 18 who had seen a healthcare provider in the previous 12 months who took part in the study.

interventionsParticipants searched for physicians on an online disclosure database, viewed payments from industry to the physicians, and assigned trust ratings. Participants were randomized to view physicians who received no payment ($0), low payment ($250-300), or high payment (>$13,000) from industry, or to a control arm in which they did not view the disclosure website. They also were asked to search for and then rate trust in their own physician. MAIN MEASURES: Primary outcomes were trust in individual physician, medical profession, and industry. These scales measure trust as a composite of honesty, fidelity, competence, and global trust. KEY

resultsCompared to physicians who received no payments, physicians who received payments over $13,000 received lower ratings for honesty [mean (SD): 3.36 (0.86) vs. 2.75 (0.95), p < 0.001] and fidelity [3.19 (0.65) vs. 2.89 (0.68), p = 0.01]. Among the 7.9% of participants who found their own physician on the website, ratings for honesty and fidelity decreased as the industry payment to the physician increased (honesty: Spearman's ρ = -0.52, p = 0.02; fidelity: Spearman's ρ = -0.55, p = 0.01). Viewing the disclosure website did not affect trust ratings for the medical profession or industry.

conclusionsDisclosure of industry payments to physicians affected perceptions of individual physician honesty and fidelity, but not perceptions of competence. Disclosure did not affect trust ratings for the medical profession or the pharmaceutical and medical device industry. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02179632 ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02179632 ).

Indexed as

TrustAdultConflict of InterestDisclosureDrug IndustryFemaleHumansInternetMaleMiddle AgedPhysician-Patient RelationsPhysiciansPilot ProjectsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID28717899
PMCPMC5653550
OpenAlexW2735744493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.