Normal-phase liquid chromatography retention behavior of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon and their methyl-substituted derivatives on an aminopropyl stationary phase.

Walter B Wilson, Hugh V Hayes, Lane C Sander, Andres D Campiglia, Stephen A Wise

Open access · greenAbstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

2citing papers in PubMed

1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

Determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons with molecular mass 302 in Standard Reference Material 1597a by reversed-phase liquid chromatography and stop-flow fluorescence detection.Analytical methods : advancing methods and applications · 2018
Article
Qualitative characterization of SRM 1597a coal tar for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and methyl-substituted derivatives via normal-phase liquid chromatography and gas chromatography/mass spectrometry.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2017
Article

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Walter B WilsonChemical Sciences Division, Material Measurement Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, 100 Bureau Drive, Mail Stop 8390, Gaithersburg, MD, 20899, USA. walter.wilson@nist.gov.

Hugh V HayesDepartment of Chemistry, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, 32816, USA.

Lane C SanderChemical Sciences Division, Material Measurement Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, 100 Bureau Drive, Mail Stop 8390, Gaithersburg, MD, 20899, USA.

Andres D CampigliaDepartment of Chemistry, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, 32816, USA.

Stephen A WiseChemical Sciences Division, Material Measurement Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, 100 Bureau Drive, Mail Stop 8390, Gaithersburg, MD, 20899, USA.

Material Measurement Laboratory · USUniversity of Central Florida · USNational Institute of Standards and Technology · US

Funding

Gulf of Mexico Research Initiative Grant 231617-00Intramural NIST DOC 9999-NIST

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Retention indices for 124 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and 62 methyl-substituted (Me-) PAHs were determined using normal-phase liquid chromatography (NPLC) on a aminopropyl (NH

Indexed as

Non-planarityNormal-phase liquid chromatographyPolycyclic aromatic hydrocarbonsRetention index

Identifiers

PMID28717893

DOI10.1007/s00216-017-0474-8

PMCPMC5709142

OpenAlexW2736056372

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceTDM

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.