Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28717884›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2017

Serum concentrations of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) do not indicate tumor recurrence in patients with glioblastoma.

Julia-Mareen Vietheer, Johannes Rieger, Marlies Wagner, Christian Senft, Julia Tichy, Christian Foerch

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Glioblastoma: Is There Any Blood Biomarker with True Clinical Relevance?International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Julia-Mareen VietheerDepartment of Neurology, Goethe University, Schleusenweg 2-16, 60528, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Johannes RiegerDepartment of Neuro-Oncology, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Marlies WagnerInstitute of Neuroradiology, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Christian SenftDepartment of Neurosurgery, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Julia TichyDepartment of Neurology, Goethe University, Schleusenweg 2-16, 60528, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. Julia.Tichy@kgu.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2182-3650
Christian FoerchDepartment of Neurology, Goethe University, Schleusenweg 2-16, 60528, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Goethe University Frankfurt · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent studies identified serum concentrations of the astroglial protein glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) to be indicative of glioblastoma (GBM) in patients with newly diagnosed space occupying cerebral mass lesions. Until now, no data is available whether GFAP serum concentrations decrease after first therapy and whether GFAP may be used as a predictor of survival and an indicator of tumor recurrence. In this prospective study, we included 44 patients with a single space occupying cerebral mass lesion suspicious for GBM. GBM was histopathologically proven in 33 cases. After initial therapy, patients were followed up until tumor recurrence (defined according to the RANO criteria) or death (maximum observation period 78 weeks). Blood was sampled on a regular basis, and GFAP serum levels were determined using an immunofluorescence assay. Prior to any intervention, 14 of the 33 GBM patients had elevated GFAP serum concentrations (median 0.25 µg/L, interquartile range 0.13-0.53), whereas only one out of 11 patients having other tumor entities revealed a slightly increased GFAP serum level (0.06 µg/L). Following surgery (i.e., biopsy, full or partial resection), all initially GFAP positive GBM patients showed decreased serum concentrations. During the follow-up period, we found a minimal GFAP increase in one patient only (0.04 µg/L; week 52), although 23 out of 31 available GBM patients developed tumor progression or died. No difference was found regarding the survival rate and the time to tumor recurrence between initially GFAP positive and GFAP negative GBM patients. In GBM patients, initially elevated GFAP serum concentrations decrease after the first diagnostic or therapeutic intervention. GFAP was not predictive for tumor recurrence.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorBrainBrain NeoplasmsDisease ProgressionFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGlial Fibrillary Acidic ProteinGlioblastomaHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPrognosisBiomarkers, TumorGlial Fibrillary Acidic ProteinBiomarkerGFAPGlioblastomaSerumTumor recurrence

Identifiers

PMID28717884
OpenAlexW2734563682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.