ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2017
Serum concentrations of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) do not indicate tumor recurrence in patients with glioblastoma.
Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Blood-Based Biomarkers for Glioma in the Context of Gliomagenesis: A Systematic Review.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Pooled it
- Blood Biomarkers of Glioma in Response Assessment Including Pseudoprogression and Other Treatment Effects: A Systematic Review.Frontiers in oncology · 2020Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Prospective evaluation of GFAP point-of-care testing for rapid diagnosis of glioblastoma.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2026Article
- Glial fibrillary acidic protein, neurofilament light, matrix metalloprotease 3 and fatty acid binding protein 4 as non-invasive brain tumor biomarkers.Clinical proteomics · 2024Article
- Blood GFAP as an emerging biomarker in brain and spinal cord disorders.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2022Review
- Clinical utility of serum glial fibrillary acidic protein in glial neoplasm.Surgical neurology international · 2022Article
- Serum microRNA is a biomarker for post-operative monitoring in glioma.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2020Article
- Glioblastoma: Is There Any Blood Biomarker with True Clinical Relevance?International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- Molecular and Cellular Complexity of Glioma. Focus on Tumour Microenvironment and the Use of Molecular and Imaging Biomarkers to Overcome Treatment Resistance.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- Serum long noncoding RNA HOTAIR as a novel diagnostic and prognostic biomarker in glioblastoma multiforme.Molecular cancer · 2018Article
- Molecular Determinants of Malignant Brain Cancers: From Intracellular Alterations to Invasion Mediated by Extracellular Vesicles.International journal of molecular sciences · 2017Review
- Biomarkers and smart intracranial devices for the diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring of high-grade gliomas: a review of the literature and future prospects.Neuro-oncology advancesReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent studies identified serum concentrations of the astroglial protein glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) to be indicative of glioblastoma (GBM) in patients with newly diagnosed space occupying cerebral mass lesions. Until now, no data is available whether GFAP serum concentrations decrease after first therapy and whether GFAP may be used as a predictor of survival and an indicator of tumor recurrence. In this prospective study, we included 44 patients with a single space occupying cerebral mass lesion suspicious for GBM. GBM was histopathologically proven in 33 cases. After initial therapy, patients were followed up until tumor recurrence (defined according to the RANO criteria) or death (maximum observation period 78 weeks). Blood was sampled on a regular basis, and GFAP serum levels were determined using an immunofluorescence assay. Prior to any intervention, 14 of the 33 GBM patients had elevated GFAP serum concentrations (median 0.25 µg/L, interquartile range 0.13-0.53), whereas only one out of 11 patients having other tumor entities revealed a slightly increased GFAP serum level (0.06 µg/L). Following surgery (i.e., biopsy, full or partial resection), all initially GFAP positive GBM patients showed decreased serum concentrations. During the follow-up period, we found a minimal GFAP increase in one patient only (0.04 µg/L; week 52), although 23 out of 31 available GBM patients developed tumor progression or died. No difference was found regarding the survival rate and the time to tumor recurrence between initially GFAP positive and GFAP negative GBM patients. In GBM patients, initially elevated GFAP serum concentrations decrease after the first diagnostic or therapeutic intervention. GFAP was not predictive for tumor recurrence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.