Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28717877›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO2017

Temporal Envelope Coding by Inferior Colliculus Neurons with Cochlear Implant Stimulation.

Kenneth E Hancock, Yoojin Chung, Martin F McKinney, Bertrand Delgutte

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Pulse timing dominates binaural hearing with cochlear implants.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Improved Neural Coding of ITD with Bilateral Cochlear Implants by Introducing Short Inter-pulse Intervals.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2018
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kenneth E HancockEaton-Peabody Laboratories, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, MA, 02114, USA. ken_hancock@meei.harvard.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5629-498X
Yoojin ChungEaton-Peabody Laboratories, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Martin F McKinneyStarkey Hearing Technologies, Eden Prairie, MN, 55344, USA.
Bertrand DelgutteEaton-Peabody Laboratories, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary · USStarkey Hearing Technologies (United States) · US

Funding

Imaging Core PlanP30DC005209 · NIDCD · MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY · PI LIBERMAN, M. CHARLES · 2002 to 2016
$12.0M
Bilateral Cochlear Implants: Physiology and PsychophysicsR01DC005775 · NIDCD · MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY · PI DELGUTTE, BERTRAND · 2003 to 2018
$6.9M
National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders P30 DC005209National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders R01 DC005775NIDCD NIH HHS P30 DC005209NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC005775
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modulations in temporal envelopes are a ubiquitous property of natural sounds and are especially important for hearing with cochlear implants (CIs) because these devices typically discard temporal fine structure information. With few exceptions, neural temporal envelope processing has been studied in both normal hearing (NH) and CI animals using only pure sinusoidal amplitude modulation (SAM) which poorly represents the diversity of envelope shapes contained in natural sounds because it confounds repetition rate and the width of each modulation cycle. Here, we used stimuli that allow independent manipulation of the two parameters to characterize envelope processing by inferior colliculus (IC) neurons in barbiturate-anesthetized cats with CIs. Specifically, the stimuli were amplitude modulated, high rate pulse trains, where the envelope waveform interleaved single cycles ("bursts") of a sinusoid with silent intervals. We found that IC neurons vary widely with respect to the envelope parameters that maximize their firing rates. In general, pure SAM was a relatively ineffective stimulus. The majority of neurons (60 %) preferred a combination of short bursts and low repetition rates (long silent intervals). Others preferred low repetition rates with minimal dependence on envelope width (17 %), while the remainder responded most strongly to brief bursts with lesser sensitivity to repetition rate (23 %). A simple phenomenological model suggests that a combination of inhibitory and intrinsic cellular mechanisms suffices to account for the wide variation in optimal envelope shapes. In contrast to the strong dependence of firing rate on envelope shape, neurons tended to phase lock precisely to the envelope regardless of shape. Most neurons tended to fire specifically near the peak of the modulation cycle, with little phase dispersion within or across neurons. Such consistently precise timing degrades envelope coding compared to NH processing of real-world sounds, because it effectively eliminates spike timing as a cue to envelope shape.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantsAnimalsCatsFemaleInferior ColliculiMaleModels, BiologicalNeuronscochlear implantsinferior colliculustemporal codingtemporal envelope

Identifiers

PMID28717877
PMCPMC5688046
OpenAlexW2735041262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.