Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28717844›Full record

ArticleDigestive diseases and sciences2017

Application of the Biopsy-Sparing ESPGHAN Guidelines for Celiac Disease Diagnosis in Adults: A Real-Life Study.

Konstantinos Efthymakis, Mariaelena Serio, Angelo Milano, Francesco Laterza, Antonella Bonitatibus, Marta Di Nicola, Matteo Neri

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Non-biopsy Strategy for the Diagnosis of Celiac Disease in Adults: A Narrative Review.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2024
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Konstantinos EfthymakisDepartment of Medicine and Ageing Sciences and Center for Excellence On Ageing and Translational Medicine (CeSI-MeT), "G. D'Annunzio" University and Foundation, Chieti, Italy.
Mariaelena SerioDepartment of Medicine and Ageing Sciences and Center for Excellence On Ageing and Translational Medicine (CeSI-MeT), "G. D'Annunzio" University and Foundation, Chieti, Italy.
Angelo MilanoDepartment of Medicine and Ageing Sciences and Center for Excellence On Ageing and Translational Medicine (CeSI-MeT), "G. D'Annunzio" University and Foundation, Chieti, Italy.
Francesco LaterzaDepartment of Medicine and Ageing Sciences and Center for Excellence On Ageing and Translational Medicine (CeSI-MeT), "G. D'Annunzio" University and Foundation, Chieti, Italy.
Antonella BonitatibusDepartment of Medicine and Ageing Sciences and Center for Excellence On Ageing and Translational Medicine (CeSI-MeT), "G. D'Annunzio" University and Foundation, Chieti, Italy.
Marta Di NicolaDepartment of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, "G. D'Annunzio" University and Foundation, Chieti, Italy.
Matteo NeriDepartment of Medicine and Ageing Sciences and Center for Excellence On Ageing and Translational Medicine (CeSI-MeT), "G. D'Annunzio" University and Foundation, Chieti, Italy. mneri@unich.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrent adult celiac disease diagnosis requires histological confirmation. However, pediatric guidelines have proposed biopsy-sparing algorithms.

aimsTo explore the applicability of the ESPGHAN criteria and assess the accuracy of serology in predicting disease in adults.

methodsWe evaluated 234 consecutive adults showing elevated anti-tTG titers, EMA-positivity, and genetic susceptibility. Patients underwent upper endoscopy with duodenal biopsy. We determined optimal anti-tTG cutoff levels using ROC curves.

resultsMean anti-tTG levels were 71.1 ± 66.5 U/ml; mean normalized levels were 14.8 ± 14.1 × ULN (mean ± SD). Partial/total villous atrophy was present in 36%/55% of cases, respectively. Anti-tTG levels correlated with histology (r

conclusionIn adult symptomatic patients showing EMA-positivity and genetic susceptibility, anti-tTG titers correlated with histology. ESPGHAN criteria performed similarly to previous studies. However, a calculated 16 × ULN cutoff showed an improved PPV. Among prevalent assays, PPV peaked differently both after normalization and standardization, indicating intrinsic differences in performance, thus preventing uniform prediction of disease in a real-life setting. Assay-specific optimal cutoffs seem possible, but would complicate diagnostic criteria. However, biopsy-sparing strategies in adults could prove useful in challenging patients.

Indexed as

Nutrition PolicyAdultBiopsyCeliac DiseaseEuropeFemaleGastroenterologyHumansMaleMiddle AgedPediatricsPractice Guidelines as TopicSocieties, MedicalYoung AdultAnti-tTGBiopsy-sparingCeliac diseaseDuodenal biopsyESPGHAN guidelinesSmall intestineVillous atrophy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.