Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28717841›Full record

Observational studyInternational journal of colorectal disease2017

Variation in care for surgical patients with colorectal cancer: protocol adherence in 12 European hospitals.

Ruben van Zelm, Ellen Coeckelberghs, Walter Sermeus, Anthony De Buck van Overstraeten, Arved Weimann, Deborah Seys, Massimiliano Panella, Kris Vanhaecht

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in International journal of colorectal disease, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03320317 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

BIC4CRC: Breakthrough Improvement Collaborative for ColoRectal Cancer

TypeobservationalSponsorKU LeuvenRan2018 to 2025Enrolled950ConditionsColorectal CancerArmsLearning session 1, Learning session 2, Learning session 3, Learning session 4
NCT03965325 completednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

FOcUs on Colorectal CAncer oUtcomes: Long-Term Study

TypeobservationalSponsorIHU StrasbourgRan2019 to 2024Enrolled133ConditionsColorectal CancerArmsUse of a standardized set to collect clinical and patient-centered data, to assess the trend of the Global Health Status overtime in colorectal cancer patients
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. [Implementation of a fast track program : Challenges and solution approaches].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2020
    Review
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Ruben van ZelmLeuven Institute for Healthcare Policy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. Ruben.vanzelm@kuleuven.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0238-6392
Ellen CoeckelberghsLeuven Institute for Healthcare Policy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Walter SermeusLeuven Institute for Healthcare Policy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Anthony De Buck van OverstraetenDepartment of Abdominal Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Arved WeimannDepartment of General, Abdominal, and Oncological Surgery, Klinikum Skt George, Leipzig, Germany.
Deborah SeysLeuven Institute for Healthcare Policy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Massimiliano PanellaLeuven Institute for Healthcare Policy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Kris VanhaechtLeuven Institute for Healthcare Policy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
European Pathway Association · BEKU Leuven · BEKlinikum St. Georg · DEUniversità degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale “Amedeo Avogadro” · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSurgical care for patients with colorectal cancer has become increasingly standardized. The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol is a widely accepted structured care method to improve postoperative outcomes of patients after surgery. Despite growing evidence of effectiveness, adherence to the protocol remains challenging in practice. This study was designed to assess the adherence rate in daily practice and examine the relationship between the importance of interventions and adherence rate.

methodsThis international observational, cross-sectional multicenter study was performed in 12 hospitals in four European countries. Patients were included from January 1, 2014. Data was retrospectively collected from the patient record by the local study coordinator.

resultsA total of 230 patients were included in the study. Protocol adherence was analyzed for both the individual interventions and on patient level. The interventions with the highest adherence were antibiotic prophylaxis (95%), thromboprophylaxis (87%), and measuring body weight at admission (87%). Interventions with the lowest adherence were early mobilization-walking and sitting (9 and 6%, respectively). The adherence ranged between 16 and 75%, with an average of 44%.

conclusionOur results show that the average protocol adherence in clinical practice is 44%. The variation on patient and hospital level is considerable. Only in one patient the adherence rate was >70%. In total, 30% of patients received 50% or more of the key interventions. A solid implementation strategy seems to be needed to improve the uptake of the ERAS pathway. The importance-performance matrix can help in prioritizing the areas for improvement.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAntibiotic ProphylaxisBody WeightClinical ProtocolsColorectal NeoplasmsCross-Sectional StudiesEarly AmbulationEuropeFemaleGuideline AdherenceHospitalsHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative CareCare pathwaysColorectal surgeryERASImportance-performance analysisProtocol adherence

Identifiers

PMID28717841
OpenAlexW2735462252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.