Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28717674›Full record

ArticleNeurology. Genetics2017

ExACtly zero or once: A clinically helpful guide to assessing genetic variants in mild epilepsies.

Caitlin A Bennett, Slavé Petrovski, Karen L Oliver, Samuel F Berkovic

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurology. Genetics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The ClinGen Brain Malformation Variant Curation Expert Panel: Rules for somatic variants in AKT3, MTOR, PIK3CA, and PIK3R2.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. No preferential mode of inheritance for highly constrained genes.Intractable & rare diseases research · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. γ2 GABAFrontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2018
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Caitlin A BennettDepartment of Medicine (C.A.B., S.P., K.L.O., S.F.B.), Epilepsy Research Centre; and Department of Medicine (S.P.), Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Slavé PetrovskiDepartment of Medicine (C.A.B., S.P., K.L.O., S.F.B.), Epilepsy Research Centre; and Department of Medicine (S.P.), Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Karen L OliverDepartment of Medicine (C.A.B., S.P., K.L.O., S.F.B.), Epilepsy Research Centre; and Department of Medicine (S.P.), Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Samuel F BerkovicDepartment of Medicine (C.A.B., S.P., K.L.O., S.F.B.), Epilepsy Research Centre; and Department of Medicine (S.P.), Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assist the interpretation of genomic data for common epilepsies, we asked whether variants implicated in mild epilepsies in autosomal dominant families are present in the general population.

methodsWe studied 12 genes for the milder epilepsies and identified published variants with strong segregation support (de novo germline mutation or ≥4 affected family members). These variants were checked in the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC), a database of genetic variation in over 60,000 individuals. We subsequently evaluated variants in these epilepsy genes that lacked strong segregation support. To determine whether the findings in epilepsies were representative of other diseases, we also assessed the presence of variants in other dominant neurologic disorders (e.g., CADASIL).

resultsPublished epilepsy variants with strong segregation support (n = 65) were absent (n = 61) or present once (n = 4) in ExAC. By contrast, of 46 published epilepsy variants without strong segregation support, 8 occurred recurrently (2-186 times). Similarly, none of the 45 disease-associated variants from other neurologic disorders with strong segregation support occurred more than once in ExAC. Reanalysis using the larger ExAC V2 plus gnomAD reference cohort showed consistent results.

conclusionsVariants causing autosomal dominant epilepsies are ultra-rare in the general population. Variants observed more than once in ExAC were only found among reports without strong segregation support, suggesting that they may be benign. Clinicians are increasingly faced with the interpretation of genetic variants of unknown significance. These data illustrate that variants present more than once in ExAC are less likely to be pathogenic, reinforcing the valuable clinical role of ExAC.

Identifiers

PMID28717674
PMCPMC5503456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.