ArticleVeterinary world2017
Prevalence of methicillin-resistant
Article in Veterinary world, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Molecular Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance Patterns of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Buffaloes from Bangladesh.Veterinary medicine and science · 2026Article
- Comparative insights into molecular characterization and resistance profiling of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus across dairy livestock in Pakistan.Veterinary research communications · 2026Article
- Characterizing Methicillin-ResistantAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- Screening of vancomycin resistance-associated genes in methicillin-resistantVeterinary research forum : an international quarterly journal · 2024Article
- Phenotypic and Genotypic Assessment of Antibiotic Resistance ofInfection and drug resistance · 2020Article
- Vancomycin-resistantAntimicrobial resistance and infection control · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThis study was conducted to determine the prevalence of methicillin-resistant MATERIALS AND
methodsA total of 136 samples (skin and nasal swab) from cattle and buffalo were collected. MRSA was identified by conventional bacterial culture techniques which were further confirmed by amplification of
resultsThe prevalence of MRSA in the current study was 28.57% and 34.28% in cattle nasal and skin swab, respectively, with an overall prevalence of 31.43% MRSA among cattle. Buffalo nasal and skin sample showed MRSA prevalence of 54.55% and 39.4%, respectively, with 46.9% overall prevalence. PCR could detect
conclusionCattle and buffalo were identified as a potential carrier of MRSA in Bihar (India). The isolation of vancomycin-resistant
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.